Calculating Work Due to Gravity on a Mars Spacecraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninjagowoowoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work required for a spacecraft to move from one circular orbit to another above the surface of Mars. The context includes gravitational potential energy and the principles of orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formula for work based on gravitational potential energy changes. Some participants confirm the method but emphasize the importance of unit conversion.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the calculations and unit conversions necessary for the problem. There is recognition of potential errors in the approach, particularly regarding the distinction between potential energy and total energy in circular orbits. Guidance is suggested to explore previous posts for additional insights.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for careful unit conversions, particularly from kilometers to meters, and the requirement for the final answer to be in joules. There is an indication that the original poster may not have fully considered the total energy in the context of the problem.

ninjagowoowoo
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
A spacecraft of mass 3120 kg is in a circular orbit a distance 1650 km above the surface of Mars. How much work must the spacecraft engines perform to move the spacecraft to a circular orbit that is 4740 km above the surface?

So I have work = change in energy
so
work= G(M_s)(M_m)(1/R_2 - 1/R_1)

or work = (6.673*10^-11)(3120)(6.41*10^23)(1/(3.4*10^6 + 4740000) - 1/(3.4*10^6 + 1650000)


Does this look right? Or am I missing something stupid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, method looks right to me. Just remember the units!
 
For some reason it's still not correct. The only units that I converted were the km -> m. Is there anything else that I needed to convert? OH and my answer should be in joules.
 
Last edited:
ninjagowoowoo said:
For some reason it's still not correct. The only units that I converted were the km -> m. Is there anything else that I needed to convert? OH and my answer should be in joules.

Looks to me like you have calculated the change in potential energy and set that equal to the work. The work should equal the change in total energy. Total energy is not too hard to derive for a circular orbit. In fact I posted it within the last few days on another thread. See if you can do it yourself, and if not search my posts to find it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K