What are the different interpretations of differentials in calculus?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter noslen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Notation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretations of differentials in calculus, particularly focusing on the notation and meaning of dy/dx. Participants explore various perspectives on the mathematical rigor and conceptual understanding of derivatives, including their applications and implications in calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the derivation of dy/dx and seek clarification on its meaning and correctness.
  • One participant states that dividing through by "dx" is not mathematically rigorous, but it leads to correct results, comparing it to separation of variables in first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • Another participant mentions that in their class, the use of expressions like "dy = 2x dx" was discouraged unless quoted, indicating a preference for rigorous treatment of differentials.
  • Some participants argue that "dy = 2x dx" can be considered a rigorous notation, asserting that it reflects the equality of differential forms on the curve defined by y = x^2.
  • Different interpretations of dx are proposed, including viewing it as a difference rather than a derivative, and as a variable rather than an infinitesimal in certain contexts.
  • One participant highlights the confusion surrounding the interpretation of differentials for students in introductory calculus courses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of differentials, with multiple competing views presented regarding the rigor and meaning of expressions involving dy and dx.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of differentials, the dependence on educational context, and unresolved mathematical steps in the discussion of rigor versus practical application.

noslen
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Notation of derivative?? help

Where does dy/dx come from I know what it means but is this right


y=x^2+2x

dy=2x*dx+2*dx

dy/dx=(2x*dx+2*dx)/dx

dy/dx=2x+2

Im not sure if this is right can someone please explian thanks :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noslen said:
Where does dy/dx come from I know what it means but is this right


y=x^2+2x

dy=2x*dx+2*dx

dy/dx=(2x*dx+2*dx)/dx

dy/dx=2x+2

Im not sure if this is right can someone please explian thanks :confused:

if [tex]y=f(x)[/tex]:
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \left(\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\right)[/tex]
 
Differentiating a function & dividing through the differential of the variable = Computing the derivative.

Daniel.
 
So is this correct Daniel?
 
Yes, it is, but not mathematically rigurous to divide through "dx", just as if it was a number. However, it leads to correct results (just like separation of variables in a I-st order ODE).

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Yes, it is, but not mathematically rigurous to divide through "dx", just as if it was a number. However, it leads to correct results (just like separation of variables in a I-st order ODE).

Daniel.
In my class we were shown rigourously how to do it and if we ever used something like "dy = 2x dx" then we were told only ever to have it in quotes like so to show it wasn't really true.

We were shown how to deal with all situations while leaving it in its rigorous form and what all the steps in between were when we made things like substitutions for integration. I actually found a bit of a struggle on this forum to deal with reading things like the above statements. Guess it's how you teach it, but I've found people at university to get very confused about issues generally around 'infinitesimals' when the lax notation is used.
 
The really confusing thing is that one may eventually learn that "dy = 2x dx" is a perfectly rigorous notation. :frown:

Specifically, it's the statement that the two differential forms "dy" and "2x dx" are equal on the curve given by the equation y = x^2. (A differential form is, loosely speaking, something you can integrate)
 
Hurkyl said:
The really confusing thing is that one may eventually learn that "dy = 2x dx" is a perfectly rigorous notation. :frown:

Specifically, it's the statement that the two differential forms "dy" and "2x dx" are equal on the curve given by the equation y = x^2. (A differential form is, loosely speaking, something you can integrate)
Yes there are several ways to think of something like
y=x^2
hence
dy=2x dx
1) as an "abuse of notation" which gives correct answers but is not logically sound.
2) where dx means difference instead of derivative and the equals is approximate and holds for small dx
dx=(f(x+dx)-f(x))=f'(x)dx+f''(x)dx^2/2+f'''(x)dx^3/6+...~f'(x)dx
3) where 2x dx and dy are differential forms
then dy is defined as dy=f'(x)dx but the dx is not really the differential of x in a sense it is another variable. That is it is just some number not an infinitessimal.
4) in nonstandard analysis the tools for working with infinitessimal quantities is developed. In this frame work dx and dy are actually infinitessimal and their quotient if defined and f'(x)=dy/dx is really a fraction of infinitessimals.

It is quite confusing how a student in intro to calc should interpet differentials.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K