What Are the New Limits of Integration for the Rare Integral with Substitution?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the new limits of integration for double integrals when making substitutions, specifically involving the variables \(xy=u\) and \(y=v\). Participants explore various integrals, including those with complex limits and real functions, and examine the implications of these substitutions on the integrals' forms and limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the integral \(\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\int_0^a g(xy)ydxdy\) and queries the new limits after substitution.
  • Another participant notes that without knowing \(g(xy)\), it is impossible to determine the limits of integration.
  • Some participants derive new limits based on the substitution, suggesting that \(u=0\) when \(x=0\) and \(u=av\) when \(x=a\), leading to the integral \(\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\int_0^{av}g(u)\frac{u+v}{v}dudv\).
  • Concerns are raised about the application of substitution rules and the Jacobian determinant, with one participant suggesting it should be \(\frac{1}{v}\) and the function becomes \(g(u)v\).
  • Some participants propose simplifying the problem by focusing on real integrals instead of complex ones, expressing skepticism about the necessity of complex analysis for these substitutions.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the substitutions and request real examples to validate the proposed transformations.
  • Discussions include various integrals, such as \(\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^a g(xy)h(y)dydx\), with participants questioning the resulting forms after substitution.
  • Participants share their results from testing specific integrals, with some expressing confusion over discrepancies in the outcomes.
  • There is a mention of the convergence of certain integrals, particularly those involving negative limits, and the implications of variable changes on convergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct limits of integration after substitution, with multiple competing views and approaches presented throughout the discussion. Some express confidence in their derived forms, while others remain skeptical and seek further clarification.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of substitution rules, the necessity of the Jacobian determinant, and unresolved questions regarding the convergence of certain integrals. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with complex analysis and its application to the problem at hand.

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
let be the integral:

[tex]\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\int_0^ag(xy)ydxdy[/tex]

then i make the substitution xy=u y=v then what would be the new limits of integration? (the y are the same than v but what would happen with the u?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've only been doing double integrals for half a year now, but without knowing g(xy) then surely there is no way to tell?
 
Last edited:
Since y= v, xy= xv= u so x= u/v. x= u/v= 0 becomes u= 0, x= u/v= a becomes u= av. The integral becomes:
[tex]\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\int_0^{av}g(u)\frac{u+v}{v}dudv[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Since y= v, xy= xv= u so x= u/v. x= u/v= 0 becomes u= 0, x= u/v= a becomes u= av. The integral becomes:
[tex]\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\int_0^{av}g(u)\frac{u+v}{v}dudv[/tex]
I'm a little confused, you don't seem to have applied the appropriate substitution rules when transforming an integral, like multiplying by the determinate of J. Did I miss something in my courses :confused:
 
i believe that the Jacobian det is

[tex]\frac{1}{v}[/tex]

and the function becomes

[tex]g(u) v[/tex]

so the integral should be

[tex]\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty} \int_{0}^{av} g(u) du dv[/tex]
 
It's much easier (and avoids any issues that may arise from the outer integral being improper and complex) to simply recognize that we're only doing a substitution on the inner integral, and the outer integral is just a relabelling of the dummy variable.
 
Me personally, I'd scrap the complex part, check it with just a real double integral, make the substitutions you guys are talking about using a real integrand, calculate the integral, and then do it another way and verify the two answers agree. I'd request this be done here but don't want you guys jumping on me. :smile:
 
Last edited:
First of all thanks to all who have answered my question :)

and what would happen for the integral.

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^a g(xy)h(y)dydx[/tex] making the change xy=u y=v

would it be [tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{av} g(u)h(v)dudv/v[/tex] ?
 
Last edited:
eljose said:
First of all thanks to all who have answered my question :)

and what would happen for the integral.

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^a g(xy)h(y)dydx[/tex] making the change xy=u y=v

would it be [tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{av} g(u)h(v)dudv/v[/tex] ?


I tell you what eljoise, you guys can discuss all these substitutions as you wish, but until I see a real example with a real integrand worked and comparred with the answer worked using no substitution, either here, or I'll probably do one myself, I'm just flat-out not convinced these substitutions work.
 
  • #10
Alright, I'm convinced. Here, I'll put two in LaTex for punish work for doubting you guys:

[tex]\int_0^1\int_0^1\frac{(xy)^2}{2}ydxdy=\int_0^1\int_0^v\frac{u^2}{2}dudv[/tex]

[tex]\int_0^1\int_0^1 e^{-(xy)}ydxdy=\int_0^1\int_0^v e^{-u}dudv[/tex]

I'll spend time reviewing the transformations. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
eljose said:
First of all thanks to all who have answered my question :)

and what would happen for the integral.

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^a g(xy)h(y)dydx[/tex] making the change xy=u y=v

would it be [tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{av} g(u)h(v)dudv/v[/tex] ?

Hello Eljoise. I get:

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^a g(xy)h(y)dydx=\int_0^1\int_v^{\infty}\frac{g(u)h(v)}{v}dudv[/tex]

For example:

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^1 e^{-(xy)}y^2dydx=\int_0^1\int_v^{\infty}e^{-u}vdudv[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #12
what about the change xy=u y=v with:

The following code was used to generate this LaTeX image:



[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx[/tex]

and [tex]\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #13
eljose said:
what about the change xy=u y=v with:

The following code was used to generate this LaTeX image:



[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx[/tex]

and [tex]\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx[/tex]

Hey Eljoise, I get:

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx=\int_1^{\infty}\int_v^{\infty} e^{-u}dudv[/tex]

The complex one, can't help. Wish I could take a class because I consider them elegant and would like to know more and also, Hurkyl tells me Complex Analysis holds the keys to the secrets of the Universe. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #14
thansk saltydog,i have checked several integral and get almost the same result as yours but this:

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx=\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-u}dudv[/tex]
 
  • #15
There's nothing to 'not work' in the substitutions, other than mistakes in the algebra (which are, unfortunately, all too easy to make).

To those requesting scrapping the complex part and comparing with a double real integral, I'm afraid you can't just write off the complex part because you don't like working with complex numbers! Complex analysis is indeed very beautiful mathematics, and worth looking into - ever wondered easy routes to evaluate horrific quotiant polynomial / trigonometric expressions? Complex analysis (sometimes) has the answer, in very mathematically beautiful forms.
 
  • #16
James Jackson said:
To those requesting scrapping the complex part and comparing with a double real integral, I'm afraid you can't just write off the complex part because you don't like working with complex numbers! Complex analysis is indeed very beautiful mathematics, and worth looking into - ever wondered easy routes to evaluate horrific quotiant polynomial / trigonometric expressions? Complex analysis (sometimes) has the answer, in very mathematically beautiful forms.

Ok James. You're right. Allow me some defense though: My suggestion of "scrapping" the complex part is only an initial effort, just to get something working that's easy, then go to the hard part. Yes, I agree. It is beautiful. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #17
eljose said:
thansk saltydog,i have checked several integral and get almost the same result as yours but this:

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx=\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-u}dudv[/tex]

I don't get that Eljoise but rather:

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx=\int_1^{\infty}\int_v^{\infty} e^{-u}dudv[/tex]

Of course the Jacobian determinant is 1/v which cancels the y. Here's the switch of variables:

[tex]y\rightarrow(0,\infty)\quad\text{so}\quad v\rightarrow(1,\infty)[/tex]

Now:

[tex]u=xv[/tex]

with v never zero. So:

when x=1, u=v and when

[tex]x=\infty\rightarrow u=\infty[/tex]
 
  • #18
and what about [tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-xy}ydydx[/tex]

with the change of variable xy=u y=v what would be then the new integral.. ...thanx
 
Last edited:
  • #19
saltydog said:
I don't get that Eljoise but rather:

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx=\int_1^{\infty}\int_v^{\infty} e^{-u}dudv[/tex]

Of course the Jacobian determinant is 1/v which cancels the y. Here's the switch of variables:

[tex]y\rightarrow(0,\infty)\quad\text{so}\quad v\rightarrow(1,\infty)[/tex]

Now:

[tex]u=xv[/tex]

with v never zero. So:

when x=1, u=v and when

[tex]x=\infty\rightarrow u=\infty[/tex]

Dang it. I hate when that happens. I have an error above. It should read:

[tex]y\rightarrow(0,\infty)\quad\text{so}\quad v\rightarrow(0,\infty)[/tex]

[tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(xy)}ydydx=\int_0^{\infty}\int_v^{\infty} e^{-u}dudv[/tex]
 
  • #20
eljose said:
and what about [tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-xy}ydydx[/tex]

with the change of variable xy=u y=v what would be then the new integral.. ...thanx

The inner integral doesn't converge right? You know, minus-minus infinity.
 
  • #21
let,s supose the integral: [tex]\int_1^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}F(x/y)ydydx[/tex] converge,then we make the change of variable x/y=u y=v what would be the new limits?..thanx..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K