Electric field is zero inside a conductor?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical explanation for why the electric field is considered to be zero inside a conductor, particularly in the context of electrostatics. Participants explore various aspects of this concept, including its implications and related phenomena such as electrostatic shielding and Faraday's cage.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the electric field is zero inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, as no charges can be moving in this state.
  • Others clarify that this condition holds true specifically in electrostatics and may not apply in other situations, such as when currents are present.
  • A participant references Faraday's cage, suggesting a connection to the concept of electric field behavior in enclosed conductive environments.
  • Another explanation involves Gauss's Law, stating that charges reside on the surface of a conductor, leading to no electric field inside cavities within the conductor.
  • One participant notes that the uniform voltage inside a metal sphere results in a zero electric field, as there is no change in voltage throughout the space.
  • It is emphasized that the assumption of zero electric field is contingent upon the charges having settled and no currents flowing within the conductor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the electric field is zero inside a conductor under electrostatic conditions, but there is some contention regarding the generality of this statement and its applicability in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the assumptions of electrostatic equilibrium and the presence or absence of currents, which are not fully resolved in the conversation.

Ebn_Alnafees
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
what is the physical explanation of the fact that the electric field is zero inside a conductor? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what is the physical explanation of the fact that the electric field is zero inside a conductor?

This is not true in general, but it is true in the realm of electrostatics. That is, if we charge a conductor, and allow it to reach equilibrium, then the electrci field is zero inside.

This is because, in equilibrium, no charges can be moving. The only way for this to be is if the (macroscopically averaged, don't think of particles think of fluid) electric field is zero.
 
Or... Are you thinking Faraday's cage kind of thing?
 
.. I think Crosson's explanation dealt with Faraday's cage.

?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zypheros_Knight
The more simple explanation is using the Gauss Law.When a conductor is charged , after equilibrium is reached , charges rest on the surface of the conductor , and inside a cavity , that is open space no charge resides , by Gauss Law , no electric field exists inside it and hence these cavity is kept protected from outside electrical influences , phenomena called "electrostatic shielding'.

BJ
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zypheros_Knight
thank you all i think i got it
 
The electric field is determined by the way in which the voltage changes from
place to place. If you are inside a metal sphere, the voltage is the same
everywhere. Since the voltage isn't changing as you move around, the electric
field measures as zero everywhere inside the sphere.
 
As somebody else said, the electric field is only zero in an electrostatic situation, in which it is assumed that all the charges have had time to "settle down" before we look at the field. We also assume there are no currents flowing (obviously, a wire carrying current has an electric field inside, or else electrons wouldn't move along it).

If there was a field inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, then the free charges in the conductor would accelerate in the direction of the field - which would mean the conductor wasn't in equilibrium - a contradiction. Hence, the conclusion follows.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lawlieto

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
838
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K