Can the Resultant of Cross Products of Vectors with Zero Resultant also be Zero?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter STAii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical property of vector cross products, specifically regarding the resultant of cross products of vectors that have a zero resultant. The conclusion presented states that if a set of vectors results in a zero vector and each is crossed with a non-zero vector, the resultant of these cross products will also be zero. This is supported by the distributive law of cross products, which confirms that u x (v + w) = u x v + u x w, leading to u x 0 = 0 when v + w = 0. The contributor, HallsofIvy, is acknowledged for clarifying the application of the distributive law in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics
  • Familiarity with vector cross products
  • Knowledge of the distributive law in vector operations
  • Basic principles of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector cross products in depth
  • Explore proofs related to the distributive law of cross products
  • Investigate applications of zero resultant vectors in physics
  • Learn about vector spaces and their properties in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced vector operations and their implications in theoretical and applied contexts.

STAii
Messages
327
Reaction score
1
Greetings !
I have made a conclusion while investigating some vector-related problem.
I am currently trying to proove it (i am sure that if it is true, lot of you would be able to proove it, but i prefer to try that myself for the moment).
What i need is only to know whether or not my conclusion is right.
Here it is :
"If you have a number of vectors (say n) that have a resultant of Zero, and you cross each one of them with a non-zero vector, then find the resultant of the cross results, then it will be zero too"
If this is not really clear, i will try to make it clearer.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In other words, the distributive law holds for cross product:

u x (v+ w)= u x v+ u x w. In the special case that v+ w= 0,

u x v+ u x w= u x 0= 0.
 
Thanks HallsofIvy.
I think i figured out how to proove it even without using distributive law (actually, i didn't know that it holds for cross product).
I will make sure i am not wrong, make everything 'mathematically beautiful' then put it here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K