Does Every Closed Form on U Being Exact Imply the Same for f(U)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rocket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Forms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between closed forms and exact forms under differentiable mappings, specifically when considering a differentiable function \( f: U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n \) and its inverse \( f^{-1} \). It is established that if every closed form on \( U \) is exact, then the same holds for \( f(U) \). The hint provided emphasizes the use of the pullback operation \( f^{\star} \) and its properties, leading to the conclusion that if \( dw = 0 \) and \( f^{\star}w = d\eta \), then \( (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta \) is also closed, thereby proving the exactness of forms on \( f(U) \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Differential forms and their properties
  • Understanding of pullback operations in differential geometry
  • Concept of closed and exact forms
  • Knowledge of differentiable functions and their inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of pullbacks in differential geometry
  • Learn about the relationship between closed and exact forms in the context of differential forms
  • Explore the implications of differentiable mappings on the topology of manifolds
  • Investigate the role of inverse functions in differential calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in differential geometry, students studying advanced calculus, and anyone interested in the properties of differential forms and their applications in theoretical physics.

rocket
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
let [tex]f:U \rightarrow R^n[/tex] be a differentiable function with a differentiable inverse [tex]f^{-1}: f(u) \rightarrow R^n[/tex]. if every closed form on U is exact, show that the same is true for f(U).

Hint: if dw=0 and [tex]f^{\star}w = d\eta,[/tex] consider [tex](f^{-1})^{\star}\eta.[/tex]
---------------------------------------------------

I'm not quite sure what the hint means or how to use it. is it true that [tex]f^{\star}[/tex] is basically another way of writing a differential - eg. df? I didn't really get a clear definition of it in my text.

anyway here's my thoughts so far:

consider [tex]w[/tex] as a form on U. suppose [tex]w[/tex] is closed. then dw = 0. since every closed form on U is exact, then there exists a [tex]\eta[/tex] on U such that [tex]w = d\eta[/tex].

but how is it that [tex]f^{\star}w = d\eta[/tex] (given in the hint)? like, how is this relationship derived? if [tex]w = d\eta[/tex] and also [tex]f^{\star}w = d\eta[/tex], then we have [tex]w = f^{\star}w[/tex]? I find that really confusing, and I'm not sure how to continue the problem. Any help is greatly appreciated. thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm rusty on this stuff, but if w is a form on f(U), then w' = (f-1)*w is a form on U. Show that if w is closed, then so is w'. If w' is closed, then there is some h' such that w' = dh'. Try to use this to show that w is also exact. Perhaps you will find that w = d(f*h') or something like that.
 


The hint is referring to the pullback of forms under a differentiable map. The pullback of a form w on U by a differentiable map f is defined as f^{\star}w = w \circ f . In other words, it is the form obtained by applying f to the variables in w. So, if w = d\eta on U, then f^{\star}w = f^{\star}(d\eta) = d(f^{\star}\eta) (using the properties of the pullback operation).

Now, since f is a differentiable function with a differentiable inverse f^{-1}, we can also define the pullback of forms on f(U) using (f^{-1})^{\star}. So, if we have a form \eta on f(U), then the pullback of \eta by (f^{-1})^{\star} would be (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta.

Using the definition of the pullback, we can see that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta = \eta \circ f^{-1}.

Now, going back to the hint, if we have dw = 0 and f^{\star}w = d\eta, then we can use the properties of the pullback to obtain (f^{-1})^{\star}dw = (f^{-1})^{\star}(0) = 0. Similarly, (f^{-1})^{\star}f^{\star}w = (f^{-1})^{\star}(d\eta) = d((f^{-1})^{\star}\eta) (using the properties of the pullback).

Therefore, if we can show that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta is a closed form on U, then we have shown that every closed form on f(U) is exact.

To show that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta is closed, we need to show that d((f^{-1})^{\star}\eta) = 0. But we already know that d\eta = w = (f^{-1})^{\star}f^{\star}w, so we can rewrite the equation as d((f^{-1})^{\star}\eta) = (f^{-1})^{\star}f^{\star}w.

Using the properties of the pullback, we
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K