Simple Harmonic Motion of skydiver

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the simple harmonic motion of a skydiver with a parachute, specifically focusing on calculating the new period of oscillation when a second skydiver is added. The original poster is attempting to determine the period using the formula T = 2π√(m/k) and is encountering discrepancies in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the spring constant k and its impact on the period of oscillation. There are inquiries about the correctness of the value of k and the method used to derive it. Some participants suggest alternative approaches to find the new period based on the masses involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on calculations and suggesting methods to clarify the problem. There is no explicit consensus on the correct value of k, and multiple interpretations of the calculations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential confusion due to mixed calculations and the need to verify the values used in the equations. The original poster references a specific expected answer from a textbook, which adds a layer of complexity to the discussion.

BDR
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I can't seem to get the right answer, where is my mistake?

A 90 kg skydiver hanging from a parachute bounces up and down with a period of 1.5 seconds. What is the new period of oscillation when a second skydiver, whose mass is 60 kg, hangs from the legs of the first?

I am using the equation T = 2pie square root of m/k.

I found k and then combined the 2 masses (m1+m2), and put that back into the equation and found an answer but not the right one.

The right answer is suppose to be 1.94 s ...i'm getting 58
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is correct, you must be doing some calculation wrong. What did you get for k?
 
I got k = 38.14 I don't know if its right though
 
There's your problem. k is much bigger than that. How did you find k?
 
your value of k is not correct check the calculations

You may also use T1/T2 = squrt of m1/(m1+m2)
 
I'm not sure that is the correct number i got for K, i have so many numbers on my paper everything is mixed together. I took the period given which was 1.5 divided by 2 pie 1.5/2pie = .239. Then i squared to get rid of the square root. Which gave me .239 = m/k. Then multiplied by k and divided.
 
I'm getting an answer of 2.5, is that correct? The correct answer is 1.94 s, or that's what the book says.
 
T = 2p sqr(m/K)
T^2= 4p^2(m/K)
K = (4*P^2*m)/T^2
put the values it gives 1579.14 N/m
how you were calculating

I suggested an easy method in the earlier posting
As K is not changing you can eliminate it from the two cases by dividing the equations of the two time periods you will get the equation I gave in that posting and by substituting the values you can calculate T2

It is always better to solve first in notations and finally calculating the numerical value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K