Calculating torque for a small horizontal strip

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swatch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the torque on a gate in a dam due to water pressure. The gate is described as being 2.00 m high and 4.00 m wide, hinged at its center. The original poster attempts to integrate the torque contributions from thin horizontal strips of the gate at various depths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of torque contributions from horizontal strips, questioning the correct expressions for force and pressure. There is a focus on the relationship between pressure, force, and depth in the context of torque calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct formulation of the force acting on the strips and the integration limits. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding pressure uniformity across the strip and how it affects the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings about the integration process and the definitions of pressure and force in the context of fluid mechanics. There is mention of varying pressure across the thickness of the strip, which may influence the calculations.

Swatch
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
The uppper edge af a gate in a dam runs along the water surface. The gate is 2.00 m high and 4.00 m wide and is hinged along a horizontal line trough its center. I have to calculate the torque about the hinge arising from the force due to the water. What I have done so far is to consider the top of the gate as point y=0 , the center as y=1 and the bottom y=2.
Then I calculate the torque of a thin horizontal strip at a depth y and integrate that over the gate.

Total torque from the top to the center would be

Torque=intergrate(r*g* dy *dA ) or 4*r*g*integrate(y^3)
(where r=density of water or 1.00*10^3 kg/m^3)

from this I get torque to be 9800 N*m

Then I do the same for the gate from height y=1 to y=2
and get -147000

The net torque I get is not the right answer, which is by the way2.61*10^4 N*m

Could someone please give me a hint to what I am doing wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear to me what you are integrating. The force on a thin horizontal strip is [itex]dF = 4 \rho g y dy[/itex]. For the top half of the gate, the torque on that piece (about the center) is [itex]d\tau = (1-y) 4 \rho g y dy[/itex]. Now integrate from y = 0 to 1 to find the net torque on the top half.

Write a similar expression for the torque on the bottom half.
 
Did what you told me Doc Al, and got the right answer. Just one thing I'm not understanding. You say that the force on a thin horizontal strip is dF=4*rho*g dy

The way I see the force is dF=dp*dA
since dp=rho*g dy and dA=4*dy
shouldn't the integration contain y^2
 
Swatch said:
Just one thing I'm not understanding. You say that the force on a thin horizontal strip is dF=4*rho*g dy
No, I said: [itex]dF = 4 \rho g y dy[/itex] (Don't forget the y.)


The way I see the force is dF=dp*dA
since dp=rho*g dy and dA=4*dy
shouldn't the integration contain y^2
[itex]dF = P dA[/itex], not [itex]dP dA[/itex]. You need the actual pressure at the depth y: [itex]P = \rho g y[/itex], not [itex]\rho g dy[/itex].
 
O.K.

So at this little horizontal strip or dA I consider the pressure as constant. Is that the correct way to think of it?
 
Swatch said:
So at this little horizontal strip or dA I consider the pressure as constant. Is that the correct way to think of it?
Right. For a small horizontal strip you can consider the pressure to be uniform, just like you can consider it to be at a single depth.

(FYI: Realize that the pressure varies from P to P + dP across the thickness of the strip. So, the average pressure is P + dP/2. So the average force would be (P + dp/2)(dA) = PdA + dp dA/2. Speaking loosely, that last term is a higher order infinitesimal and can be ignored compared to PdA.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K