What is the relationship between initial velocity and tire marks after braking?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaTario
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Braking Tires
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between the initial velocity of a car and the length of tire marks left on the ground after braking. It explores the empirical formulas and underlying physics, including concepts of friction and acceleration, in the context of vehicle dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an empirical formula relating initial velocity and tire mark length when brakes are applied at maximum force.
  • Another participant provides a formula using the relationship v = √(2ad), where 'a' represents acceleration influenced by conditions such as friction.
  • Dimensional analysis is mentioned as a potential tool for deriving the expression, prompting a discussion on the kinematics of uniform acceleration.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity introduced by gravity in the formula, with questions about the maximum coefficient of friction in ideal conditions.
  • Participants discuss the coefficient of friction, noting it can vary significantly based on conditions, with typical values for good tires on asphalt being around 1 to 1.2.
  • There is a mention of different types of friction and the limitations of the Coulomb friction model in practical applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the role of gravity and friction in the braking process. There is no consensus on the exact values of the coefficient of friction or its implications in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about ideal conditions and the variability of friction coefficients, which are not fully resolved. The dependence on specific material interactions and braking conditions is acknowledged but not conclusively defined.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
Does anybody know the empirical formula that relates the initial velocity of a car in a street with the length of the mark on ground left by the tires when the brakes are set at maximum force, stopping the wheel ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]v=\sqrt{2ad}[/tex]
a is somewhere between 0 (on ice) and 1 g (ideal conditions, really good rubber). A g is 32 ft/s/s. So for example if a is .75 g (sorta typical), d = 100 ft,
[tex]v=\sqrt{2*.75*32*100}=69\,\mbox{ft/s}[/tex]
or 47 mph.
 
Now I realized that dimensional analysis could have helped...

But is there any simple way to derive this expression ?
 
It's just an example of uniformly accelerated motion. Are you familiar with the kinematics of uniform acceleration?
 
Ok, I got it now. But the reason it seems to me as a little more envolved problem was the presence of gravity acceleration in the explanation and formula of Mr. Krab. Was it because the friction coeficient can reach some sort of "maximum value" in ideal situations? It still doesn't make sense to me.

But the mention to Torricelli equation has cleared the way a lot.
 
DaTario said:
But the reason it seems to me as a little more envolved problem was the presence of gravity acceleration in the explanation and formula of Mr. Krab.
The force of friction depends on the coefficient of friction and the normal force. The normal force is just the weight = mg. Thus the acceleration [itex]a = F/m = ( \mu m g)/ m = \mu g[/itex].
 
Ok. I am satisfied with the answer.
Just another complemetary question regarding something Mr. Krab has said:

[tex]v = \sqrt{2 a g}[/tex]

a is somewhere between 0 (on ice) and 1 g (ideal conditions, really good rubber). A g is 32 ft/s/s.

Is it true that [itex]\mu[/itex] is 1 in the friction between tires' rubber and the asphalt ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DaTario said:
Is it true that [tex]\mu [\itex] is 1 in the friction between tires' rubber and the asphalt ?[/tex]
[tex] <br /> Yes, it is about 1-1.2 for good tires on hot asphalt. It's quite a bit less (~0.6) if the wheels are locked.[/tex]
 
Thank you so much...
But friction coeficient can be much larger than that for other pairs of materials isn't it?
 
  • #10
Well, racing tires can generate quite a bit more friction (as can regular tires on special surfaces), but [tex]\mu[/tex] still won't go much over 2 or 3. For most pairs of materials, it is less than 1.

Also note that there are different types of friction, and the one being discussed here (Coulomb friction) is pretty limited. I'm only talking about cases where [tex]F_{\rm{max}}= \mu N[/tex] is a reasonable approximation. It's pushing it for street car tires, and not very good at all for certain types of racing tires.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K