Is Calculus a Smooth Transition After Mastering Trig and Algebra 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Teaching
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the representation of complex numbers on the Gaussian coordinate plane and the transition from trigonometry and algebra to calculus. Participants are exploring the intuitive grasp of complex numbers and their geometric interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how complex numbers like 3+5i can be represented as coordinates (3,5) on the Gaussian plane. Questions about the logic behind this representation and the nature of the transition to calculus are raised.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the representation of complex numbers as vectors and discuss the relationship between complex numbers and real number pairs. There are differing opinions on the transition to calculus, with some suggesting it is not as smooth as others might expect.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the isomorphism between complex numbers and vector representations, as well as varying perspectives on the difficulty of calculus compared to previous math subjects.

Brady
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm in the complex numbers section of a trig book, and I'm having trouble intuitively understanding how a number like 3+5i can become (3,5) on the Gaussian coordinate plane...the logic behind it doesn't jump out at me...

Any help?

And is calculus generally a smooth transition after mastering trig and algebra 2, or is it something totally different?

Thanks a lot,
Brady Yoon :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brady said:
Hi, I'm in the complex numbers section of a trig book, and I'm having trouble intuitively understanding how a number like 3+5i can become (3,5) on the Gaussian coordinate plane...the logic behind it doesn't jump out at me...


ummm. The idea of the Gaussian plane is to represent complex numbers as vectors. We chose the x-axis to host the real part of the complex number and the y-axis to host the imaginary part. Thus a complex number a+bi has the vector representation (a,b) in the Gaussian plane.


though you might not completely understand this, I will add that [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbb{R}^2[/itex], as groups, are isomorphic to one another [according to the isomorphism that assigns to each complex number its corresponding vector in the Gaussian plane: f(a+bi) = (a,b)].
Maybe someone else can extrapolate on what intesresting things this implies; I'd be interested. Thx.
 
Last edited:
a smooth translation from trig is non existent. calculus is just a lot of algebra with a few more formulas thrown in. don't let it scare you though, it isn't as hard as you think
 
That's just a way of representing the complex numbers. Just as we can think of real numbers as numbers on a "number line", since every complex number, a+ bi, requires two real numbers, we need two number lines to represent complex number. It happens to be simplest to make those number lines perpendicular. The complex number a+bi is represented by the pair (a,b) in an obvious way and that corresponds to the point with coordinates (a, b).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
14K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K