Integration by Parts in Several Variables

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formula for integration by parts in multivariable calculus, specifically addressing the necessity of a closed curve in the context of line integrals. Participants explore connections to Gauss's theorem and seek clarification on terminology and concepts related to divergence.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of a closed curve in the line integral related to the integration by parts formula provided by their professor.
  • Another participant references Gauss's theorem and suggests substituting a specific function into the theorem to perform algebraic manipulations.
  • A participant seeks confirmation on whether Gauss's theorem is synonymous with the Divergence Theorem, indicating a potential lack of clarity on terminology.
  • A later reply confirms that Gauss's theorem and the Divergence Theorem are indeed the same.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion shows some agreement on the terminology of Gauss's theorem and the Divergence Theorem, but the necessity of a closed curve in the integration by parts context remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There is an assumption that the participants are familiar with multivariable calculus concepts, but the discussion does not provide a proof for the integration by parts formula or clarify the implications of the closed curve requirement.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
My professor gave me the following formula for integration by parts in my multivariable calculus class. He said that we wouldn't find it in our book, and he didn't provide a proof. I have tried to work through it, but I am still left with one question: Why is it necessary that the curve is closed (the line integral)?

[tex]\int\int_{D}f(x,y)\frac{\partial g}{\partial x,y}dA=\oint_{\Sigma}f(x,y)g(x,y)\mathbf{n}\cdot d\mathbf{s}-\int\int_{D}g(x,y)\frac{\partial f}{\partial x,y}dA[/tex]

For lack of a better notation, I used [tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x,y}[/tex] to represent the fact that the derivative could be with respect to either x or y.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gauss's theorem states

[tex]\int\int\int_{V} \vec{\bigtriangledown} \cdot \vec{F} d \tau = \oint_{S} \vec{F}\bullet\textbf{n}dS[/tex]

substitute [tex]F = fg[/tex] anad do the algebra
 
Ok, by Gauss's Theorem do you mean the Divergence Theorem? I haven't heard of it referred to as that before and wanted to make sure they're the same :smile:

[tex]\iint\limits_S\mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S}=\iiint\limits_V\operatorname{div}\mathbf{F}dV[/tex]

Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
apmcavoy said:
Ok, by Gauss's Theorem do you mean the Divergence Theorem?
That is correct :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K