Do you think the shuttle program should be continued?

  • Thread starter Thread starter case_wp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuation of the shuttle program, exploring the benefits and costs associated with it. Participants express their views on space exploration, funding priorities, and the role of private companies in space travel.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue against continuing the shuttle program, citing pressing issues on Earth that require funding and attention.
  • Others express support for space research but suggest that resources should be allocated to robotics instead of the shuttle program.
  • A participant suggests that the government shuttle program should be retired in favor of private companies taking over space exploration.
  • There is a viewpoint that the shuttle program, while needing replacement, is currently the only means for the US to send humans into space.
  • One participant humorously proposes the idea of space elevators as a future solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express disagreement regarding the continuation of the shuttle program, with multiple competing views on the future of space exploration and funding priorities.

Contextual Notes

Participants' arguments reflect a range of assumptions about the value of space exploration versus terrestrial issues, as well as differing opinions on the role of private versus government-led initiatives in space travel.

case_wp
Do you think the shuttle program should be continued?

http://www.duken.nl/vote/vote.php

e.g. do you think the benefits weigh up against the costs?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No and no.
 
No, and no.

I think the US (and indeed the whole world) has enough problems down here to worry about before having to throw money out into space.
 
I think its time to put the shuttle to rest too. But I am still in favor of space research, but let's put some of the great robotics to work.
I don't believe that money will cure the worlds problems.
 
hypatia said:
I think its time to put the shuttle to rest too. But I am still in favor of space research, but let's put some of the great robotics to work.
I don't believe that money will cure the worlds problems.
Ditto

zoquo[/color]
 
It's definitely time to retire the government shuttle program and let private companies take over.
 
I just think that the money could be much better spent elsewhere, since NASA has always been a bit of a showcase anyway! :smile:
 
The end of the age of state supremacy in the night sky is nearly over. Space now belongs to Richard Branson.
 
Yes and no (at least if we're talking about tangible benefits).

The shuttle needs to be replaced with something better, but it's the only thing the US has that can put humans into space. I don't think endlessly orbiting the Earth is much of a human space program, either. If the world were a 10'x10' bedroom, the trip from the surface of the Earth to International Space Station would be like traveling 4 inches outside your bedroom door (of course, if the world were a 10'x10' bedroom, it would be a bedroom where no one has moved more than an 1/8 of an inch away from the wall into the room either).
 
  • #10
we need space elevators :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K