If one wanted to become a theoretical Physcist

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theoretical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the educational pathways for aspiring theoretical physicists, particularly the choice between pursuing a PhD in pure mathematics versus a PhD in physics. Participants explore the implications of each path in relation to mastering the necessary mathematics for theoretical physics, especially in fields like string theory.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the increasing overlap between mathematics and theoretical physics may make it beneficial for a future physicist to pursue a PhD in pure mathematics first, particularly in areas related to physics like topology.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the choice of department (math vs. physics) should depend on the individual's goals and the specific area of interest within theoretical physics.
  • Some participants argue that a strong and active environment in both mathematics and physics is crucial for success, regardless of the chosen path.
  • There is a suggestion that if one has a specific problem in mind, pursuing a mathematics-focused path might be more appropriate to gain the necessary knowledge.
  • Resources and pages from notable physicists are shared as potential aids for those interested in string theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best educational path; multiple competing views remain regarding the advantages of pursuing mathematics versus physics for a career in theoretical physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the importance of departmental focus and the relevance of specific mathematical training, indicating that the discussion is influenced by personal experiences and individual goals.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
There is so much mathematics in theoretical physics these days such as string theory that it may be hard to distinguish mathematicians from theoretical physicst, although this lack of distinction applied to Newton and others as well.

My question is would you recommand an (average level intelligent) future theoretical physicst to do a Phd in pure mathematics (related to physics such as topology) and go back to physics once the mathematics has been mastered. Or do a Phd in physics and pick up the higher level mathematics such as Topology, abstract algebra etc

Considering that this person is not a genius than I presume that the former (Phd in math) is a better choice since it is much harder to learn higher level mathematics by one self compared with picking up a physics textbook without any fear of the mathematics in it and ready to absorb all the physics inside. But I could be wrong. Any suggestions.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out this site from Nobel laureate Gerardus t'Hooft

regards
marlon
 
Most of the theoretical physicists at my university are actually in the maths department. But it depends on what you want to do with it that matters
 
In my opinion,...

wherever you go should be strong and active (especially regarding seminars) in both mathematics and physics.

(Depending of where you study, it seems "theoretical physics" is done in either "physics" departments, as one would expect, or in "applied mathematics" departments, like http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/ )

if your real goal is physics, I'd choose a physics path supplemented by mathematics. I would suggest the reverse if you had a very specific problem in mind and felt that a math path would teach you what you really needed to know for that specific problem.


If you are interested in string theory, Amanda Peet's page may be helpful
http://www.physics.utoronto.ca/~peet/home/straightdope.html .
There's also Warren Siegel's entertaining pages
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/prep.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/curriculum.html .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K