Gaussian Integral Using Residues

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of the Gaussian integral using contour integration techniques. Participants explore the challenges and mistakes encountered in applying these methods, particularly focusing on the behavior of the integral along certain contours in the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to evaluate the Gaussian integral by considering the contour integral of e-z2 over a half-circle in the upper-half plane, concluding that the integral equals zero.
  • Another participant points out that the Gaussian diverges to infinity on the arc of the contour, suggesting that this is a critical mistake in the original approach.
  • Further elaboration indicates that the oscillatory nature of the exponential function complicates the evaluation, leading to potential divergence issues along the chosen contour.
  • One participant expresses a desire to solve the integral using complex integration despite acknowledging that polar coordinates provide an easier method.
  • A reference is made to a historical article that discusses multiple methods of evaluating the Gaussian integral, including contour integration, suggesting that there are established techniques that may be more effective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are significant challenges in using contour integration for the Gaussian integral, with multiple viewpoints on the effectiveness of this method compared to others. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the behavior of the integral along the contour and the oscillatory nature of the integrand, which complicates the evaluation. There is also a mention of alternative methods that may provide clearer results.

ghotra
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I am trying to to the Gaussian integral using contour integration.

What terrible mistake have I made.

[tex] I = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{e}^{-x^2} \mathrm{d}x[/tex]

I consider the following integral:

[tex] \int_C \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z[/tex]

where [itex]C[/itex] is the half-circle (of infinite radius) in the upper-half plane.
There are no singularities in the upper-half plane. So,

[tex] \int_C \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z = 0[/tex]

Now, I can break this integral up into two parts.

[tex] 0 = \int_C \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{e}^{-x^2} \mathrm{d}x + \int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=\pi} \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z[/tex]

Or...

[tex] \int_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{e}^{-x^2} \mathrm{d}x &= - \int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=\pi} \mathrm{e}^{-z^2} \mathrm{d}z = <br /> -\lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} \int_{0}^{\pi} \mathrm{e}^{-R^2 \exp(2\mathrm{i}\theta)}\cdot \mathrm{i} R \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta} \mathrm{d}\theta \stackrel{?}{=} \sqrt{\pi}[/tex]

I know the answer should be [itex]\sqrt{\pi}[/itex]...so the RHS must give this result! But it does not...at least, I have convinced myself that the RHS actually goes to zero. The exponential dominates the linear term, so in the limit as R goes to infinity, the RHS equals zero.

How can this be...it seems I have shown that the gaussian integral is zero.

I should cry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The terrible mistake have you made is the Gaussian diverges to infinity on the arc. You could show that all the integrals of the Gaussian from 0 to points r*exp(i theta) are equal when sin(theta)<=cos(theta). This won't answer any thing though as you would still need to calculate one such integral. I feel that this integral is not best done by contour integration (though it is possible and I have seen it done). There are other easier ways.
 
lurflurf said:
The terrible mistake have you made is the Gaussian diverges to infinity on the arc.
...which becomes painfully obvious when I include the effect of the oscillations. It is true that R->infinity makes exp(-R^2 exp(2*I*theta)) very large...but the oscillation causes it to go back and forth between +infinity and -infinity.

It seems that no matter which contour I pick (as far as infinite semi-circles go), I will have this issue. At iR and -iR, e^(-z^2) will have trouble. Thus, it seems that my contour CANNOT be anything that goes to infinity in the imaginary part.

I know that the Guassian integral can be done easily in polar coordinates...that doesn't concern me. I _want_ to do it when complex integration. So how do you do it?
 
This page about statistics
http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/maths/histstat/
has an article called Information on the History of the Normal Law
in which the desired integral is found 7 ways. #7 uses contour integration
In specific the function f(z)=exp(pi i z^2)/sin(pi z) is integrated on the parallelogram with vertices +-1/2+-Rexp(pi i/4) where R goes to infinity.
Also the oct 98' issue of the American Mathematical Monthly has an article on this integral (actually an integral that this one is a special case of).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K