Equation of the line given a translation vector (that is coincident) and a point

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of a line that passes through the point (1,1) and remains unchanged under the translation vector a = (3,2). Participants explore the implications of the translation and how it relates to the line's direction and equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the terminology "maps onto itself" and interprets it as indicating a parallel and coincident line.
  • Another participant clarifies that translating a line by (3,2) results in the same line only if the translation is in the direction the line is facing, suggesting that the direction vector of the line is (3,2).
  • A different participant proposes that since the line maps onto itself under the translation, both the original point (1,1) and the translated point (4,3) lie on the line.
  • There is a suggestion that the translation vector (3,2) can be considered the same as the direction vector of the line, leading to a vector equation of the line.
  • Another participant provides a method to derive the line's equation using points and slopes, indicating that multiple forms of the line's equation can be valid.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretation of the translation vector and its relationship to the line's direction. However, there are different approaches to deriving the line's equation, and no consensus is reached on a single method or final equation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the equations derived may depend on the choice of coefficients, leading to multiple valid representations of the same line.

singleton
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Hey,

Usually I have a general idea how to tackle a problem when posting on here.

This time I am pretty darn lost :(

When asked to find the equation of the line that passes through a point (1,1) and maps onto itself under the translation vector a = (3,2).

I start with Ax + By + C = 0

The equation of the image is
A(x - 3) + B(y - 2) + C = 0
Ax - 3A + By - 2B + C = 0

The point (1, 1) satisfies the equation since the translation "maps onto itself" (I'm taking this as it means a parallel and coincident line? not heard that terminology before..."maps onto itself") So the point is on both lines...

Basically I know that (1, 1) satisfies the equation of the image, and that when I substitute I end up with
Ax - 3A + By - 2B + C = 0
A(1) - 3A + B(1) - 2B + C = 0
-2A -B + C = 0

I almost wanted to say the normal vector for the translation was (-2, -1) but that is incorrect, as those numbers (-2 and -1) are the coefficients I have for A and B AFTER I substitute not BEFORE...

Just a small hint or suggestion how to tackle this Q would be great :)

I know (rather, I think) that I should be exploring the equation of the image (the translation) but I do not know what more I can do to find the normal vector (so I can write the Cartesian equation of the unknown line)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you translate the line by (3,2) then you get the same line back. For example, if you have the x-axis, and you translate it by (3,2), you get a different line, but if you translate it by (3,0) you get the same line. Translating a line will give you back the same line if and only if you translate in the direction that it's already "facing." So you can tell from this the direction vector of the line, and you already know one point that lies on the line, so you have all the necessary information to describe it (and give its Cartesian equation if you want).
 
Oh forgive me please.

It is my understanding that if the line "maps onto itself under a translation along vector a = (3,2)" we know that what this says is that the new line is the same line as before, correct?

Then, if we find the image of point (1,1) under the translation vector (3,2), which is point (4,3) we know that this point is on the line. We also know that the original point, (1, 1) is on the line since it is still the same line as before...

So the translation vector is also the same as the direction vector, (3,2) ?
And the vector equation is: r = (1,1) + t(3,2) ? (then find a normal vector and go from there)
 
Last edited:
Yes to all questions.
 
thanks very much :)
 
Essentially, saying that the vector <3,2> translates the line into itself just means that the vector <3,2> points "in the same direction" as the line. Even more helpful: if (x,y) is a point on the line then so is (x+3, y+2).

Here you are told that the point (1,1) is on the line and the vector <3,2> translates the line into itself. (1,1) translated by <3,2> is (1+3,1+2)= (4, 3) so we know that the two points (1,1) and (3,2) are on the line.

Write the line y= mx+ b. (1,1) is on the line means 1= m(1)+ b or m+ b= 1. (3,2) is on the line meas 2= m(3)+ b or 3m+ b= 2. Subtracting m+ b= 1 from that gives
2m= 1 or m= 1/2. m+ b= 1 becomes 1/2+ b= 1 so b= 1- 1/2= 1/2.

The equation of the line is y= (1/2)x+ 1/2 or 2y= x+ 1.

You could, of course, use the form Ax+ By= C. Putting x= 1, y= 1 gives A+ B= C.
Putting x= 3, y= 2 gives 3A+ 2B= C. That's two equations for 3 unknowns but that is because multiplying Ax+ By= C by any number gives another equation for the same line. We can choose one of the numbers to be anything (except 0) that we like and still have an equation for the same line.

Subtracting A+ B= C from 3A+ 2B= C eliminates C leaving 2A+ B= 0 or B= -2A. Choosing A= 1 gives B= -2 and C= A+ B= 1- 2= -1.

The equation is x- 2y= -1 which is the same as 2y= x+ 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K