Uranium power/weight ratio in fission reactors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the power-to-weight ratio of uranium in fission reactors, specifically focusing on how much uranium ore is needed to generate a specified amount of electricity over an extended period. Participants explore theoretical benchmarks, technical definitions, and comparisons to real-world electricity consumption.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about benchmarks for the amount of uranium ore required to generate 1000 million watts of power continuously for 10,000 years.
  • Another participant defines specific power as Watts/kgU and mentions burnup (GWd/tU) as a conventional term for energy produced per unit mass of uranium.
  • It is noted that typical maximum rod average burnup in commercial power reactors is about 55-60 GWd/tU, with potential for higher burnups in fast reactors.
  • A participant raises the question of how power consumption will vary based on the interior surface area and population of their hypothetical ark, suggesting a need for Earthly comparisons.
  • There is a request for figures on the yearly electricity consumption of a small-town community of 3,000 people in North America, with a participant providing per capita electrical generation statistics for the US, Canada, and Mexico.
  • Another participant mentions that it takes a ton of uranium ore to produce one pound of uranium used in nuclear power plants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the amount of uranium needed and the definitions of related terms, but no consensus is reached on specific figures or comparisons. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact benchmarks and comparisons to real-world scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that power consumption will depend on various factors, including the specific design and usage of the hypothetical ark, and that comparisons to Earthly communities may vary significantly based on location and population density.

AA Institute
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a couple of more questions for all the kind and learned people here.

Are there any (approx) benchmarks for quantifying how much uranium ore (kg) is going to be rquired in order to generate a given amount of electricity over a specific length of time? Let me clarify...

Hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to generate 1000 million watts of power per day (10^9), continuously, over a period of 10,000 years, how much uranium ore (mass, in kg) would I need to dig out of the ground in order to satisfy this demand?

What would be a technical definition or name for this kind of power/weight assessment?

Thanks for any suggestions.

AA
______________________________________________________________
http://www.publishedauthors.net/aa_spaceagent/
(PS & off topic: In case anyone is wondering why, I want to power the lighting inside my interstellar ark, the 'Centauri Princess', featured in my novel : First Ark to Alpha Centauri!) :smile:
_______________________________________________________________
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
AA Institute said:
Are there any (approx) benchmarks for quantifying how much uranium ore (kg) is going to be rquired in order to generate a given amount of electricity over a specific length of time?
Yes

AA Institute said:
Hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to generate 1000 million watts of power per day (10^9), continuously, over a period of 10,000 years, how much uranium ore (mass, in kg) would I need to dig out of the ground in order to satisfy this demand?

What would be a technical definition or name for this kind of power/weight assessment?
The term of Watts/kgU is specific power. One can also calculate power density in the fuel Watts/m3.

However, the conventional term is burnup, GWd/tU or GWd/kgU or MWd/kgU, which describes the energy produced per unit mass of U. Some use the mass of UO2, as in MWd/kgUO2.
To get the mass of U, one need only determine the energy and time over which the energy is generated.

Currently in many commercial power reactors (LWRs), typical maximum rod average burnup is about 55-60 GWd/tU (Although fuel can conceivably reach about 70-75 GWd/tU without problems), where 1 tU = 1000 kgU. In fast reactors, burnups of 100-200 GWd/tU are possible.

The principal technical issues with respect to LWR fuel include corrosion of the cladding and rod internal pressure. The objective here is to make sure that fission products are retained in the fuel rod throughout operation and subsequent handling.
 
Thanks. I suppose everything will depend upon how much power consumption will take place. Since the interior surface area of my ark will be of approx. 600 square kilometres, and the population will be around 3,000 people (on average) along the 50,000 year long journey (!), I wonder if there are any Earthly parallels to compare this with?

I wonder if there are any figures available for the total yearly electricity consumption of a small-town community of 3,000 people somewhere in N. America...(how much power wattage they consume over 1 year)...
 
AA Institute said:
I wonder if there are any figures available for the total yearly electricity consumption of a small-town community of 3,000 people somewhere in N. America...(how much power wattage they consume over 1 year)...

Well "somewhere" can be a broad range of electrical usage. Hill towns in Mexico might compare decently enough to a little town in the US or Canada but the larger the population in a city, the larger the discrepencies get!

If you'll go to the CIA world factbook, you can determine the following figures.

Per capita electrical generation in the US: ~12200kwh/year
Per capita electrical generation in Canada: ~14800kwh/year
Per capita electrical generation in Mexico: ~1780kwh/year

Also, I believe it takes a ton of uranium ore to make 1 pound of the type of uranium used in nuclear power plants. Wonder where Morbios is, bet he could figure this stuff out off the top of his head.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
16K
Replies
10
Views
13K
Replies
12
Views
12K