Solving Integral Trouble: \int ln(2x+1)dx

  • Thread starter Thread starter laker88116
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of the natural logarithm function, specifically \(\int \ln(2x+1)dx\). Participants are exploring integration techniques, particularly integration by parts, and examining the steps involved in solving the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts integration by parts and expresses confusion about a potential error in their reasoning. Some participants suggest alternative methods, such as simplifying the integrand before applying integration techniques. Others note the redundancy in the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and alternative perspectives on the problem. There is recognition of the original poster's progress, and some guidance has been offered regarding simplification strategies. However, there is no explicit consensus on a single approach to the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integration techniques and questioning the necessity of repeated integration by parts. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's struggle with the problem setup and the implications of their chosen methods.

laker88116
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
[tex]\int ln(2x+1)dx[/tex]

So far I know that I need to use integration by parts, I let [itex]u= ln(2x+1)[/itex] and so [itex]du= \frac {dx}{2x+1}[/itex]. Also, I said [itex]dv= dx[/itex] and [itex]v=x[/itex].

So then plugging this into the equation for integration I get:

[tex]xln(2x+1) - \int \frac {2x}{2x+1}dx[/tex]

Then I determine that I need to do integration by parts again on the latter half of the function. So, for [itex]\int \frac {2x}{2x+1}dx[/itex], I let [itex]u= 2x[/itex] and so [itex]du= xdx[/itex]. Also, I said [itex]dv= \frac {dx}{2x+1}[/itex] and [itex]v= \frac {ln(2x+1)}{2}[/itex].

So then plugging this into the equation for integration I get:

[tex]\int \frac {2x}{2x+1}dx = xln(2x+1) - \int ln(2x+1)dx[/tex]

Now, I have like terms so I say that:

[tex]\int ln(2x+1)dx = xln(2x+1) - [xln(2x+1) - \int ln(2x+1)dx].[/tex]

I am not sure where I made an error here. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oi, so complicated >_<

You don't have to integrate by parts again. You can split the fraction like:

[tex]\frac{2x}{2x+1}=1-\frac{1}{2x+1}[/tex]

But even simpler is first solving:

[tex]\int \ln x dx[/tex]
then the integral should be a piece of cake. The straight way to Rome is not always the shortest, nor the easiest to follow.
 
[tex]\int ln(2x+1)dx = xln(2x+1) - \int \frac {2x}{2x+1}dx = xln(2x+1) - \int 1 - \frac {1}{2x+1} dx[/tex]
 
Wow, how did I miss that, thanks so much.
 
Anyways, as to the actual method you implemented, your second integration was simply undoing the first integration by parts you tried. That's why you got a useless result at the end.
 
It's not productive to do the problem for the person asking for help. (especially when you do it wrong!) Fortunately, the poster had already figured it out from the hints!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
13K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K