Course selection for applied physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around course selection for an exchange student studying physics at the University of Copenhagen, who is considering applying to the University of California, Irvine. The focus is on exploring options in applied physics and engineering, particularly in relation to the student's interests and future career aspirations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • The student expresses uncertainty about which engineering discipline to pursue, considering electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, or computer science, and notes a lack of knowledge in these areas.
  • Some participants suggest that the student should reach out to faculty or staff at UC-I for specific advice on course selection.
  • One participant shares their intention to pursue applied physics in graduate school, indicating that a B.S. in physics is sufficient for this path.
  • The student mentions receiving guidance from UC-I staff, who recommended electrical engineering as it aligns with their applied physics route.
  • The student contemplates whether to take a full year of engineering courses or to focus on computer science, reflecting on their desire to learn programming.
  • There is an acknowledgment of the student's limited experience in physics, which complicates their ability to determine their specific interests and future direction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the student should seek advice from UC-I staff, but there are multiple competing views regarding which engineering field would best complement the student's physics education. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal course selection.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the student's uncertainty about their interests and the implications of their limited experience in physics on their course choices. There is also a dependency on the definitions of applied physics and engineering disciplines, which may vary between institutions.

Dracovich
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Well, so the backstory is this: I'm studying physics at the university of copenhagen, and i'll be applying shortly to get in as en exchange student to the university of california (most propably Irvine) for one year (my final year in my BS studies). And i wanted to take advantage of the fact that they have some engineering courses there since i am interested in perhaps the more "applied" side of physics, please bear in mind that I've only finished my first year so I'm not the most knowledgeable when it comes to these things, so excuse any errors i may make in my assumptions.

Well anyway, it seems that UCI has an applied physics route to follow, but it obviously assumes you have more then one year to spread your studies over. But all their non-physics courses seem to be in electrical engineering, and to be honest i only have a vague idea of what that encompasses. So i was not sure if that should be the field of engineering that i should be trying to get into, or perhaps if mechanical or some other field would better suit. Also, since i will have finished all the courses that are obligatory for my physics degree by the time i go to USA (assuming i get in), i can choose to take no physics courses and follow entirely the route that a first year engineer might take. But i wasn't sure if that was preferable seeing as i might perhaps have already learned a good deal of what they are doing. So i was not sure if it would be best to pick 2-4 courses that suit my needs (or what courses would be good) or if jumping entirely into an engineering path for one year would suit my needs better. Lastly, i do also want to learn some programming, and was even considdering skipping the engineering route and going for more in-depth CS courses, perhaps following an entire year of it as i was considdering with the engineering.

basically, I'm not sure what courses in engineering compliment my physics education the best, and i have a sneaky suspicion that it might heavily depend on what my interests are and what i intend to be working with in the future, but the problem with that is that I've only done one year of physics so i don't feel like i have a good picture of what i want to do, other then that i seem to be more drawn towards a more experimental/applied side of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any advice given here can only be of a general nature. For specific advice regarding course selection, I recommend you email faculty/staff/students at UC-I.
 
I'm planning to go into applied physics in grad school. People I've talked to said I can do it with a regular B.S. in physics just fine.

But yeah, email the staff...

PL
 
I realize it's kinda taboo giving out advice on this, i read the thread on this board in reagards to that etc, and i obviously won't go out like a zombie and do whatever this board tells me, but i figured perhaps people had different oppinions or experiences with various fields that they could convey to me that i would then factor into my decision making.

Anyway i did contact them (i visited their campus as well since i was in california this summer) and they seemed to steer me in the direction of EE since that was what their applied physics route traditionally did. At that time though, i had not thought of doing the entire year of engineering. Nor to, perhaps, take CS courses insted of engineering. Which i why i thought perhaps i could get some feedbkac on those ideas here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K