Eigenfunctions and Energy Measurements in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter t1mbro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the Hamiltonian operator, energy eigenvalues, and eigenfunctions. The original poster is preparing for an exam and seeks clarification on the normalization of a wavefunction and the calculation of probabilities associated with energy measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normalization of the wavefunction and the implications of orthogonality among eigenfunctions. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the wavefunction as a vector and the calculation of probabilities for energy measurements.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on calculating the normalization constant and the probabilities associated with different energy eigenvalues. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and properties of wavefunctions and eigenfunctions, with no explicit consensus reached on all points.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific postulates from their lectures, indicating constraints on the methods they can use for calculations. The original poster expresses a need for clarification due to the complexity of the material and the urgency of their exam preparation.

t1mbro
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ok so I am revising for an exam that's in a day or so and I'm totally stuck on some revison questions, needless to say i need to understand what's going on not just get an answer so if someone can help me do this I would be grateful. Should be pretty easy it's basic stuff from last yr but my mind is going at about 1000miles an hour and i can't think straight.

Hamiltonian operator for particular system has energy eigenvalues En (n = 1,2,3) and corresponding normalized eigenfunctions Un. the eigenfuntions corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal. The wavefuntion of the electron is given by.

Si = K(3U1 +4U2)

(a)calc real normalisation const, k
(b)what is probability P1 that measurement of energy would give E1?
(c)................E2?
(d)................E3?
(e)Using p1 and P2 determine the average value for energy of the electron.
(f)Evaluate expectation vaule of hamiltionian operator for an electron in state Si and show that this is the answer obtained in (e)

numerical answers:
a) 1/5
b)9/25
c)16/25
d)0
e) (9E1+16E2)/25

I'm supposed to use what in our lectures were postlates 4 and 6.

4. something about si (x,t) = SUM (j) cj SIj (x) exp(-iEjt/hbar)

where Ej is energy associated with SIj

mmm can't write rest as with limited keyboard.

and postulate 6.

Pl = |al|^2/ SUM |an|^2 where SI = SUM (n) an SIn

Sorry I realize the type is confusing will clarify anything needed, thanks for help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You vector is k(3U1+ 4U2). Assuming that these eigenvectors are orthonormal as well as orthogonal (that is, they are taken to be unit vectors), then 3U1+ 4U2 has length
[tex]\sqrt{3^2+ 4^2}= \sqrt{25}= 5[/tex]
In order to make k(3U1+ 4U2) a unit vector, k must equal 1/5.

In that case k(3U1+ 4U2)= 1/5(3U1+ 4U2)= (3/5)U1+ (4/5)U2+ (0/5)U3. The "amplitudes" for U1, U2, U3 are 3/5, 4/5, and 0 respectively. Their probabilities are the squares of those: 9/25, 16/25, and 0.
 
ok, what you said makes sense, except, why is it a vector? am i being utterly stupid?
 
(a) In general a wavefunction (stationary state) looks like this:
[tex]\Psi = K( c_{1} u_{1} + c_{2} u_{2} + c_{3} u_{3} + ...)[/tex]
where K is the normalization constant.

The numbers [tex]c_{1},c_{2},c_{3},c_{4}...[/tex] are the coefficients.

You can calculate K by [tex]K=\sqrt{|c_{1}|^2+|c_{2}|^2+|c_{3}|^2 +...}[/tex],
so what you do is you take the absolute square of each coefficient, sum them up and take the squareroot of this sum =>
that's K

Your wavefunction is:
[tex]\Psi = K(3 u_{1} + 4 u_{2})[/tex]
[tex]\Psi = K(c_{1} u_{1} + c_{2} u_{2})[/tex]

Your coefficients are [tex]c_{1}=3[/itex] and [itex]c_{2}=4[/itex][/tex][itex].<br /> Plugging this into the formula for K you get:<br /> [tex]K= \sqrt{|3|^2+|4|^2} = \sqrt{25} = 5[/tex]<br /> <br /> Thus your wavefunction is:<br /> [tex]\Psi = \frac{1}{5}(3 u_{1} + 4 u_{2})[/tex]<br /> [tex]= \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \frac{4}{5} u_{2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now you have the new, normalized coefficients:<br /> [tex]\Psi = b_{1} u_{1} + b_{2} u_{2}[/tex]<br /> [tex]= \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \frac{4}{5} u_{2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> The new normalized coefficients are:<br /> [tex]b_{1} = \frac{3}{5}[/tex]<br /> [tex]b_{2} = \frac{4}{5}[/tex]<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(b)</b> You can get [tex]p_{1}[/tex][/itex][tex]by the formula [tex]p_{1} = |b_{1}|^2[/tex],<br /> that is you just have to pick out the "normalized" coeficient [tex]b_{1}[/tex]<br /> in front of the eigenfunction [tex]u_{1}[/tex] and take the absolute square of it. <br /> Look above, the coefficient in front of <br /> [itex]u_{1}[/itex] is [itex]b_{1}= \frac{3}{5}[/itex]. Thus, using the formula [itex]p_{1} = |b_{1}|^2[/itex] you obtain 9/25. <br /> I repeat: Use the normalized coefficient! (not the [tex]c_{1}[/tex])<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(c)</b> You do the same as in (b), pick out the coefficient in front of [itex]u_{2}[/itex], which <br /> is [itex]b_{1} = \frac{4}{5}[/itex] (see above). You obviously get [itex]p_{2} = \frac{9}{25}[/itex]<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(d)</b> Just take again the formula [tex]p_{3} = |c_{3}|^2[/tex].<br /> But then the question is where do you get [tex]|c_{3}|^2[/tex] from? It's the coefficient in front of [tex]u_{3}[/tex], but since [tex]u_{3}[/tex] doesn't appear in the wavefunction [tex]\Psi = \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \frac{4}{5} u_{2}[/tex], the coefficient is zero. <br /> <br /> To better understand this you could also write:<br /> [tex]\Psi = \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \fract{4}{5} u_{2}[/tex]<br /> [tex]= \frac{3}{5} u_{1} + \fract{4}{5} u_{2} + 0 u_{3}[/tex], right? (I just added a zero there)<br /> Then you see the coefficient is zero in front of [tex]u_{3}[/tex].<br /> <br /> <br /> <b>(e)</b> The average energy is defined as: <br /> Expectation value for energy [itex]= \sum_{i} p_{i} E_{i}[/itex]<br /> (just as you know it from school).<br /> <br /> Just plug in the values you obtained before:<br /> Expectation value for energy [itex]= \frac{9}{25} E_{1} + \frac{16}{25} E_{2} = \frac{1}{25} \left (9E_{1} + 16E_{2} \right )[/itex]<br /> <br /> <b>(f)</b> The expectation value is defined as [tex]\langle \hat{H} \rangle = \langle \Psi| \hat{H} | \Psi \rangle[/tex].<br /> (i) First calculate [tex]\hat{H} | \Psi \rangle[/tex], <br /> (ii) then "multiply" from the left side [tex]\langle \Psi |[/tex].<br /> <br /> Hint for (i): [tex]\hat{H} |u_{1}\rangle = E_{1} |u_{1} \rangle[/tex], <br /> and [tex]\hat{H} |u_{2}\rangle = E_{2} |u_{2}\rangle[/tex]<br /> Hint for (ii): [tex]\langle u_{1} | u_{1} \rangle = 1[/tex] and [tex]\langle u_{2} | u_{2} \rangle = 1[/tex], and: [tex]\langle u_{1} | u_{2} \rangle =0,[/tex] and [itex]\langle u_{2} | u_{1} \rangle = 0[/itex][/tex][itex].[/itex]
 
Last edited:
oh that's all so easy, thanks edgardo!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K