Limits Question: Why Does f(-6) = d.n.e?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around the concept of limits in calculus, specifically examining the behavior of a function f at the point x_0 = -6. The original poster expresses confusion regarding why the limit does not exist (d.n.e.) at this point, despite observing that the function approaches positive infinity from both sides.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of limits, particularly in relation to infinite limits and the implications of a limit being classified as d.n.e. There is discussion about the behavior of the function as it approaches -6 and the confusion surrounding the terminology used in limit definitions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the definitions and implications of limits. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between infinite limits and the concept of limits not existing, but there remains a lack of consensus on the original poster's understanding of the situation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a graph that cannot be reproduced, which may limit the ability to fully visualize the problem. The original poster's description of the function's behavior at -6 is central to the discussion, but the lack of a visual aid may contribute to the confusion.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
This question involves a graph, but, unfortunately, I have no means of reproducing it. I shall try my utmost to describe it, or rather the section of it that confounds me.

Consider the function f. For what values of x_0 does the lim x-->x_0 f(x) exist, where -9<= x_0 <=4?

The answer says that at the value x_0 = -6 the limit does not exist (d.n.e.), but I think the limit is positive infinity and don't know why it d.n.e.

Here is the description:

f(-6) = 3, so there is a black point at (-6,3). Now as x approaches -6 from the left side, the curve goes upward, or without bound (+infinity). As x approaches -6 from the right side, there is another curve that goes upward, or without bound (+infinity), so it seems like there is a vertical asymptote at x_0 = -6 (but a point exists at -6).

This is the section that baffles me. If you need a clearer description, I shall try to do my best.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To say that a limit is infintiy implies that the limit does not exist. The definition of a limit does not allow infinite limits (although it does allow limits where a variable is allowed to approach infinity).
 
So D.N.E. implies that the limit is not close to a single real number? I am still confused over the term . . . :confused: When is the limit in this case +infinity? Is it because of how the question is worded?? I was trying to follow that two-sided limit of a function rule. . . (Now I feel horribly lost.)

Thanks for your patience.
 
Last edited:
You can write that the limit is infinity, that is not wrong, but this means that the limit does not exist. If you look at the epsilon-delta definition of the limit, you will see that a limit of infinity is impossible because it is required that the function come arbitrarily close to the limit. So, for example, if the limit is 5, the funtion must come within 1 of 5, and within .1 of 5 and any so on. But a number can not be within .1 of infinity. It's just a confusing notational thing to write limit=infinty, when this really means that limit d.n.e., and the function gets bigger than any specified value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K