Coding Differentiation: Need Math Program Help

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ranger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Code
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around coding a program specifically for differentiation, focusing on how to implement differentiation rules in programming languages like C, C++, or Java. Participants explore the challenges of coding such a program without relying on computer algebra systems (CAS) and express curiosity about the underlying processes involved in symbolic differentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests code extracts for a program that solves differentiation, specifying a desire for clarity on how a computer evaluates differentiation problems.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether the request pertains to numerical differentiation.
  • Participants discuss the systematic nature of differentiation and propose rules for coding differentiation, including product, sum, and chain rules.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of typesetting and simplification in the output of differentiation results.
  • Some participants suggest that text parsing would be necessary for input validation and function handling, indicating that this could be tedious.
  • Links to resources and papers are shared, with one participant suggesting Lisp as a suitable environment for such programs.
  • There is a discussion about the purpose of the inquiry into differentiation coding, with various motivations proposed, such as understanding differentiation better or contrasting computer and human approaches.
  • One participant mentions a simple Java calculator for differentiation and shares a link to its source code.
  • There is a debate regarding whether Maple qualifies as a computer algebra system, with differing definitions of CAS being discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of Maple as a CAS and the necessity of using a CAS for differentiation tasks. There is no consensus on the best approach or programming language for implementing differentiation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to input validation, typesetting, and simplification processes, noting that these aspects could complicate the implementation of a differentiation program.

ranger
Gold Member
Messages
1,687
Reaction score
2
Does anyone know where to find or how to code a program that solves differtiation. Just differentiation and nothing esle. No computer algebra system. It doesn't even have to be a functional program, just some code extracts so I can see how the computer evaluates these problems.

language = C or C++. Java would be fine also.

--thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear what you mean. Do you mean a numerical differentiation?
 
i mean that given a function f, find f`. Example

f = x^3 + 3x + 4
f`= 3x^2 + 3

No need to find the numerical value.
 
Last edited:
ranger said:
Does anyone know where to find or how to code a program that solves differtiation. Just differentiation and nothing esle. No computer algebra system. It doesn't even have to be a functional program, just some code extracts so I can see how the computer evaluates these problems.

language = C or C++. Java would be fine also.

--thank you
That would be easy to code as differentiation is very systematic. The problem would be typesetting and simplification. Without nice (hard to write) simplification and type setting the results would be very ugly. You would just need a few rules and use them in combination.
(u*v)'=u'*v+u*v'
(u+v)'=u'+v'
(u^v)'=v*u^(v-1)*u'+u^v*log(u)*v'
(f(g))'=f'(g)g'
exp'(x)=exp(x)
log'(x)=1/x
sin'(x)=cos(x)
cos'(x)=-sin(x)
and so on
 
lurflurf said:
That would be easy to code as differentiation is very systematic. The problem would be typesetting and simplification. Without nice (hard to write) simplification and type setting the results would be very ugly. You would just need a few rules and use them in combination.
(u*v)'=u'*v+u*v'
(u+v)'=u'+v'
(u^v)'=v*u^(v-1)*u'+u^v*log(u)*v'
(f(g))'=f'(g)g'
exp'(x)=exp(x)
log'(x)=1/x
sin'(x)=cos(x)
cos'(x)=-sin(x)
and so on

That is how the rules would be coded? So for example the C programming language has built in fuctions for dealing with differentiation?
 
ranger said:
That is how the rules would be coded? So for example the C programming language has built in fuctions for dealing with differentiation?
no no. You would need to have some text parsing. What exactly are your goals with this project? The text parsing could be quite tedeous.
here are some sloppy ideas
Say your functions are
sin()
cos()
exp()
log()
+(,)
-(,)
*(,)
/(,)
^()()
-()
first you would have your parser check that the function was valid
then it could count the x's, then use differentiate with respect one x at a time and add the results. It would then start at the proper x and work backward until finished
say you
what makes this hard is
-checking the input function is valid
-allowing freedon in keying imput function
-reduceing the answer so it does not look silly ie
f=x*x*x
f'=x*x+x*x+x*x
-allowing many functions
-making the results pretty
 
Its not really a project. I'm just curious on how it would solve it.
then it could count the x's, then use differentiate with respect one x at a time and add the results
.

How would that code look like(for the differentiation section)?

It would be damn ugly to look at x*x*x*x + x*x
 
Here are some links from my web search. Several pages have suggested lisp as a good environment for programs of this type.

used lisp
http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/sicp/book/node39.html
somewhere a class called CS 381K had this as homework (uses lisp)
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/novak/asg-symdif.html
paper about coding this in c++
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/coots98/full_papers/gil/gil_html/gil.html
more lisp
http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~cameron/Teaching/384/971/Lectures/deriv.html
 
Thanks for these good readings lurflurf. I'll look into them right away. So lisp is better suited for this then?
 
  • #10
implicit differentiation? MAPLE
 
  • #11
neurocomp2003, I'm not interested in a computer albebra system. I just want to know how a computer evaluates the discussed subject i.e seeing the source code.
 
  • #12
ranger said:
neurocomp2003, I'm not interested in a computer albebra system. I just want to know how a computer evaluates the discussed subject i.e seeing the source code.
For what purpose? I can think of a few.
(1) understand differentiation better yourself
(2) to contrast how a computer program performs differentiatio with how a human does
(3) to see how actual step that are simple for a human are implemented

(1) is not likely, as you would need to follow individual steps out. Some steps would be ugly, possibly all steps without a good simplification process, if you did have good simplification it could make things more confusing.
(2) unlike integration, computers do symbolic differentiation much more like a human would. There are simple rules that can be followed in a deterministic fashion. The simplification, acceptable input check, and answer formating are where all the action it.
(3) is the area that could be most productive. It would also be very tedious. The process goes
-develop unambigues notation for input and output
-develop code for programe to deal with functions
-develope method for ensuring that imput and output are in proper form
-define rules by which valid imput is systematically reduced
-implement simplification to above step lest answer looks yucky
-implement typeset for answer lest looks yucky
All that is of some interest, but the details are very tedeous.
 
  • #13
  • #14
i thought maple has source code available..and maple is not a computer algebra system. If your looking for source code then your above post should be changed and you shouhld take a numerical methods/analysis course. It involves changing the function into its taylor approx. series.
 
  • #15
Thanks for pointing to the code Orion1. It will take sometime for me to analyze it.

neurocomp2003, thanks for telling that maple has its source available.
http://www.math.utah.edu/lab/ms/maple/src/
You're saying that maple isn't a CAS (or doesn't have CAS capabilities)? Well in that case I've been lied to all my life.
 
  • #16
what your definition of CAS? I was under the impression that MATLAB was CAS but maple deals with more analysis.
Unless your talking about symbolic programming?
 
  • #17
When I say CAS, I mean a program that does math fuctions. Like thoes fuctions from algebra, calculus, diff equations. Functions such as exapnsion, differentiation, factoring, limits, etc. No programming. A good example of a CAS is the one found on texas instruments TI-89 series a calculators.

I'm sure that maple supports this capability.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K