Which Formula Correctly Represents Velocity: V=v0 + 2at or V=v0 + at?

  • Thread starter Thread starter r3dxP
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the correct formula for velocity in the context of kinematics, specifically addressing the relationship between initial velocity, acceleration, and time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning which of the two formulas accurately represents velocity, with one participant suggesting that acceleration multiplied by time should yield velocity. Another participant points out a potential confusion between different kinematic equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring different interpretations of kinematic equations, with some participants providing insights into the relationships between variables. There is no explicit consensus on which formula is correct, but there is an indication of productive dialogue regarding the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

One participant expresses frustration over previous misunderstandings, indicating a possible lack of clarity in their understanding of the topic. The discussion also touches on the distinction between simple integration of acceleration and established kinematic equations.

r3dxP
which one is correct?

V=v0 + 2at ? or V=v0 + at ?
where v0 is initial and a is acceleration and t is time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V=v0 +at

The acceleration part should be common sense. Acceleration * time = velocity.
 
**** i did all my questions wrong .. FUKFUKFUKUFKUFKUFK
 
You're mixing the simple time integration of constant acceleration with Galilei's formula

[tex]v^{2}=v_{0}^{2}+2 a x[/tex]

also valid for constant acceleration along the Ox axis.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K