Stumped Calc Students: Can You Solve This Diff. Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aresius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the derivative of a complex rational function, specifically \( y = \frac {(2x+3)^3} {(4x^2-1)^8} \). The original poster mentions that the entire class is struggling with the problem, and they reference a textbook answer without understanding the derivation process.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the chain rule and quotient rule to differentiate the function. There are attempts to clarify the derivatives of both the numerator and denominator, with some participants questioning the correctness of the derivatives calculated. Others express confusion about the application of the chain rule and the simplification of terms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing feedback on each other's calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct application of the chain rule and simplification steps, but there is still uncertainty about specific derivatives and simplification processes.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the complexities of the chain rule and its application in this context. There is mention of potential errors in derivative calculations and the need for careful consideration of each term involved in the differentiation process.

Aresius
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
This is a problem that has stumped my entire class of Calc 1 students and two Calc 2 students.

[tex]Find \frac {dy} {dx}[/tex]

[tex]y = \frac {(2x+3)^3} {(4x^2-1)^8}[/tex]

I know that the answer is (from the textbook, but I don't know how it got there)

[tex]-\frac {2(2x+3)^2(52x^2+96x+3)} {(4x^2-1)^9}[/tex]

I'll attempt to show my work in the next post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First I took the derivative using the chain rule of both the numerator and the denominator and applied them into the quotient rule.

[tex]f' (2x+3)^3 = 6(2x+3)^2[/tex]
and
[tex]g' (4x^2-1)^8 = 256x(4x-1)^7[/tex]

Applying the quotient rule I get this

[tex]\frac {6(4x^2-1)^8(2x+3)^2 - 256x(4x-1)^7(2x+3)^3} {[(4x^2-1)^8]^2}[/tex]

I have no clue where they went from there...
 
g' is wrong, your coefficient in front of the seventh' power parenthesis should be 64, not 256.
 
There should be a "squared" in the (4x - 1) bracket on the right of the top line of the quotient, then it just cancels.
 
Aresius said:
First I took the derivative using the chain rule of both the numerator and the denominator and applied them into the quotient rule.

[tex]f' (2x+3)^3 = 6(2x+3)^2[/tex]
and
[tex]g' (4x^2-1)^8 = 256x(4x-1)^7[/tex]

Applying the quotient rule I get this

[tex]\frac {6(4x^2-1)^8(2x+3)^2 - 256x(4x-1)^7(2x+3)^3} {[(4x^2-1)^8]^2}[/tex]

I have no clue where they went from there...
As arildno said, your g' is wrong. Your denominator is [tex](4x^2-1)^{16}[/tex]
You can divide all the terms by a [tex](4x^2-1)^7[/tex]. After that, it's just some factoring and multiplication in the numerator.
 
I thought that because of the chain rule you have to take the derivative of the derivative of 4x^2 - 1 and multiply it by the others in sequence.

God I hate the chain rule...

I think I messed up g' more than I thought... You cannot touch the damn original function! :cry:
 
Last edited:
Did you get there now or still need help?
 
Wait, I already did that, never mind...
 
Ok am I on the right track here?

[tex]\frac {6(4x^2-1)(2x+3)^2 - 64x(2x+3)^3} {(4x^2-1)^9}[/tex]
 
  • #10
You must take the derivative of 8x as per the chain rule and then multiply it into that term.

Am I right?

In that case I would have a 512 in front of that x, bleh
 
  • #11
Yes, seems to be correct so far :smile:
 
  • #12
Was that to my last post? Because I somehow doubt it :(
 
  • #13
It was in referrence to
Aresius said:
Ok am I on the right track here?

[tex]\frac {6(4x^2-1)(2x+3)^2 - 64x(2x+3)^3} {(4x^2-1)^9}[/tex]
So you're doing ok so far.
 
  • #14
But that I don't get, as per the chain rule you must first get 8 from g', then 8x from what was in the brackets, then another 8 from 8x. Multiply them together and you get 512x, why is it still 64x?
 
  • #15
You have a bit too many 8's then ...

[tex]\left( {\frac{{\left( {2x + 3} \right)^3 }}<br /> {{\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^8 }}} \right)^\prime = \frac{{6\left( {2x + 3} \right)^2 \left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^8 - 64x\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^7 \left( {2x + 3} \right)^3 }}<br /> {{\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^{16} }} = \frac{{6\left( {2x + 3} \right)^2 \left( {4x^2 - 1} \right) - 64x\left( {2x + 3} \right)^3 }}<br /> {{\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^9 }}[/tex]

One comes from the power (x^8 => 8x^7) and the other one from (4x²)' = 8x, which gives 8*8x = 64x.
 
  • #16
Yes, and then you must take the derivative of 8x and multiply that on because of the chain rule, right?

I thought that as long as you can take a rational derivative with the chain rule, you should.
 
  • #17
[tex]8(4x^2-1)^7(8x)(8)[/tex] is how we do chain rule in class.

Perhaps I'm horribly mistaken and I've forgotten part of the rules of the chain rule...
 
  • #18
We're finished at that point, no more 8's to multiply...

[tex]\left( {\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^8 } \right)^\prime = 8\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^7 \cdot \left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^\prime = 8\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^7 \cdot 8x = 64x\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^7[/tex]

Ah no, you have an 8 extra. The derivative of 4x² is just 8x; not 8x*8 since (4x²)' = 4*(x²)' = 4*2x = 8x.
 
  • #19
Am I right so far in simplifying (using pascal's triangle and binomial theorem)

[tex]\frac {6(4x^2-1)(2x+3)^2 - 64x(8x^3+36x^2+54x+27)} {4x^2-1)^9}[/tex]
 
  • #20
Yes, that is correct. You also could've factored out [itex](2x+3)^2[/itex] first.
 
  • #21
The answer to the problem still has the (2x+3)^2 so I left it as it is, am I wrong?
 
  • #22
It's not wrong but it'll be easier to factor it out. As you say, the factor is still there in the answer.

[tex]\frac{{6\left( {2x + 3} \right)^2 \left( {4x^2 - 1} \right) - 64x\left( {2x + 3} \right)^3 }}<br /> {{\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^9 }} = \frac{{2\left( {2x + 3} \right)^2 \left( {3\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right) - 32x\left( {2x + 3} \right)} \right)}}<br /> {{\left( {4x^2 - 1} \right)^9 }}[/tex]

Now work out everything in those last parenthesis.
 
  • #23
Got it!

Thanks!
 
  • #24
Great :smile:
 
  • #25
It's sometimes easier to use substitution to organize yourself.

I know you don't think the derivative of [tex]4x^2-1[/tex] is 8*8x. Your problem was the same a lot of people have with the chain rule - once they get going, they don't know when to stop.

If you had broken it out as:

[tex]4x^2-1 = u[/tex] then you have two problems:

You need to find the derivative of [tex]u^8[/tex]

You need to find the derivative of [tex]4x^2-1[/tex]
 
  • #26
I don't know why I thought this, but I thought as long as you had a term that could be counted as a function inside the original function, you should take it's derivative and multiply in series as per chain rule.

I think I see what you mean though, you only take derivative of what has not been derived already. The original function never changes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
114
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K