Continuity and Intermediate Value Theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two questions related to continuity and the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT). The first question involves finding a constant that ensures continuity of a piecewise function, while the second question requires demonstrating the existence of a root for the equation tan(x) = 2x within a specified interval.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the constant c for continuity by equating limits from both sides of a piecewise function. They express uncertainty about their results. In the second question, they apply the IVT but question the validity of their approach, particularly regarding the endpoints of the interval.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the continuity problem, suggesting a more careful consideration of the quadratic equation's discriminant. In the IVT discussion, there is a focus on ensuring that the values used for testing the function are within the specified interval, with suggestions to find appropriate values that satisfy the conditions of the theorem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's use of endpoints in the IVT is incorrect, as they fall outside the specified interval. There is also mention of potential mistakes in the calculations related to the continuity problem.

scorpa
Messages
367
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I have come across two questions that I have solved, but unfortunately am quite sure I've done them incorrectly. They are related to continuity and the intermediate value theorem.

Find the constant c that makes g continuous (-infinity,infinity).

g(x){ x^2-c^2 if x<4
{ cx+20 if x>4


For this question I found that the graphs is continuous from (-infinity,4),[4,infinity] Then I found the limits as x approaches 4 from the left and right. which ended up being 16-c^2 and 4c+20. I then made these expressions equal to each other to solve for the constant c and ended up getting c=-4 and c=8. Neither of these values work, and I'm not quite sure what I should have done.

Use the I.V.T to show that there is a root of the given equation inthe specified interval
tanx=2x (0,1.4)


tanx-2x=0
when f(0) you get 0
When f(1.4) you get 2.99

therefore f(0) <0<f(1.4)

What I did here just seems wrong, there must be more to it than that, but that's all I can get from reading the textbook.

Thanks again
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) You didn't solve for the constant correctly. There is only one possibility for c (i.e. if you're using the quadratic equation, the discriminant b² - 4ac = 0).

2) First of all, 0 is not even in the interval (0, 1.4). And in fact, neither is 1.4. What you did is indeed wrong. Suppose I say we have the function f(x) = x. If your proof is valid, then there is a number c in that interval such that f(c) = 0 because f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1, and f(0) < 0 < f(1). What you need to do is show that there is a in (0, 1.4) such that f(a) < 0, and b in (0, 1.4) such that f(b) > 0. Given that f is continuous on all of the reals, the following would also suffice:

f(0) < 0 and f(c) > 0 for some c in the interval
f(0) > 0 and f(c) < 0 for some c in the interval
f(1.4) < 0 and f(c) > 0 for some c in the interval
f(1.4) > 0 and f(c) < 0 for some c in the interval

The first three cannot be satisfied, but you can show the fourth. However, just to be safe (since you might get questions where f is only defined on the given interval) pick a and b INSIDE the interval (0, 1.4) such that f(a) < 0 and f(b) > 0. Better yet, find a such that f(a) < 0 and b such that f(b) > 0. This should be really easy, it's just a matter of picking numbers and you should be able to draw the graph of the function g(x) = tanx - 2x yourself and see where you can find numbers that do the trick. If you're allowed to use a calculator it should be even easier.
 
Ok, I figured out the first one, I was just making a stupid mistake, thanks for you help on that. I'm still not sure of the last question, but I will keep at it.Thanks again.
 
Knowing that f(0)= 0 doesn't help you because it is quite possible that f(x) might just rise from 0 up to f(1.4) without ever being equal to 0 again. And, as AKG pointed out, 0 is not in the interval and so does not count as a solution.

Can you calculate f(1)= tan(1)- 2?
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K