Solving 3^{20} $\pmod{100}$ Without FLT

  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating \(3^{20} \mod{100}\) without using Fermat's Little Theorem (FLT). The conclusion reached is that \(3^{20} \equiv 1 \mod{100}\) can be demonstrated through binomial expansion and the method of successive squaring. The binomial expansion of \(9^{10}\) reveals that all terms except the last two are multiples of 100, leading to the conclusion. The discussion emphasizes that FLT is not applicable in this case as it involves primes, which are not relevant here.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with binomial expansion
  • Knowledge of successive squaring technique
  • Basic concepts of powers modulo
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about binomial expansion in modular arithmetic
  • Study the method of successive squaring for modular exponentiation
  • Explore the applications of Fermat's Little Theorem in number theory
  • Investigate Carmichael numbers and their properties
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in advanced modular arithmetic techniques.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
[tex]3^{20}\equiv 1\pmod{100}[/tex]

How can I show this? I can't see any use of Fermat's Little Theorem here (unless I'm just missing it).

FLT is the only way I know how to do these. Does anyone have a suggestion on how to do it for something like this?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that [itex]3^{20} = 9^{10} = (10 - 1)^{10}[/itex]. If you do a binomial expansion each term has the form [itex]10^{r} \times (-1)^{n-r}[/itex]. The last term is [itex](-1)^{10} = 1[/itex] and the next to last term is [itex]\binom {10}{9} 10^1 \times (-1)^9[/itex]. Since all the prior terms are multiples of 100 and [itex]\binom {10}{9} = 10[/itex] we conclude [itex]3^{20} \equiv 1 \mod{100}[/itex]
 
i think the theory is called powers modulo something...and the method is successive squaring. FLT has nothing to do with your problem because you are not dealing with the concept of primes or pseudo primes(carmicheals i think).

successive squarign tech(you can always check mathworld.com to see if I'm right)
so you have a^c=x mod m
x is your unknown.
step one: expand c to its binary representation.
step two: start iwth a^1 mod m.
step three: square a^1 mod m ot get a^2 mod m
step i: square the preivous mod m to get the next square
step last: multiply all the squares mod m for which there is a 1 in the binary rep.








but you can always do the above suggested technique.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K