Another crazy attempt to get in space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom10331
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of constructing a space plane intended for low Earth orbit (LEO) or high atmospheric flights. Participants explore various aspects of the design, including engine specifications and material choices, while expressing concerns about oxygen supply and structural integrity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the engine design is complete, but there is uncertainty about the appropriate amount of oxygen needed for the flight duration of 2-4 minutes.
  • Concerns are raised about the choice of tungsten as a construction material, with one participant arguing it is too dense and brittle for aerospace applications.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of building a spacecraft from a single metal and emphasizes the need for a team of aerospace engineers and significant funding.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the overall project, suggesting it may not be practical or safe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of support and skepticism regarding the project. There is no consensus on the viability of using tungsten or the overall approach to constructing the space plane.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed engineering analysis, potential oversights in material properties, and the absence of a clear plan for addressing safety and funding challenges.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in aerospace engineering, amateur rocketry, or the challenges of constructing experimental aircraft may find this discussion relevant.

Tom10331
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hey me and my friend Kyle are trying to make a space plane that will get us to LEO or at least high atmosphiric flights.We think we got the engine design done right but the problem is knowing the amount of oxygen we should have.

Extra:The flight is going to be about 2-4 minutes long. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom10331 said:
Hey me and my friend Kyle are trying to make a space plane that will get us to LEO or at least high atmosphiric flights.We think we got the engine design done right but the problem is knowing the amount of oxygen we should have.

Extra:The flight is going to be about 2-4 minutes long. :biggrin:
Burlington...how far from Ottawa is that? Tell us when you fly it!

Um...on a more serious note...how are you doing this?
 
Whatever the formulae say about the required air supply, double it because you'll probably be hyperventilating for the whole time. :-p
 
This is boarderline trolling.
 
rocketboy said:
Burlington...how far from Ottawa is that? Tell us when you fly it!

Um...on a more serious note...how are you doing this?

Hey Burlington from Ottawa is about 5 hour drive :smile:
On that serious note we are doing this because we got guts and a high temp metal molder thingy and an order of tugstin(may not be spelling)metal because of it's high boiling point.

But the main problems are getting support from friends and family,get the tugstin metal and getting the right amount of the oxygen for the flight.(oh you and the moneyy :mad: )
Well hope it works.

P.S don't know when the flight is. :cry:
 
I hope you realize in time that tungsten is one of the worst choices that you can make for spaceship or aeroplane construction. The reason that it's used for darts and armour penetrating ammunition is its very high density. It's also quite brittle.
 
But how come it's on the Space Shuttle :confused:
 
There are hundreds of metals, chemicals, and alloys used on the Shuttle. You can't build a spacecraft out of a single metal, any more than you can build a spaceplane without a team of aerospace engineers and a few hundred million dollars.

The best you'll manage is to strap yourself into a tungsten can and then cook yourself alive.

Happy sailing.
 
I can't believe this thread is still open.
 
  • #10
Gee, Fred... we have to have a bit of fun once in a while. :devil:
 
  • #11
FredGarvin said:
I can't believe this thread is still open.

Man... you're no fun.

Second person today asking me to close it. I guess I have to close it...
:frown:
 

Similar threads

Ramjet artillery shell of a big size
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
SpaceX SpaceX: Interplanetary Transport System
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
SpaceX Starship (/Super Heavy) testing: Mk1 stacked, 20 km flight this year
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
11K
Kerbal Space Program - Duna Rocket Launch
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Kerbal Space Program - Rocket Design Basics
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Can we achieve practical personal flight with current options?
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
10K
Bell siphon: output rate multiple times higher than the input rate?..
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Kerbal Space Program - Efficient Launch into Orbit
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • Sticky
Kerbal Space Program Tutorial Series - Open Access to 1.7
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
71K
Other Which pathway should I take for my brilliant dream to come true?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K