How Does Gravitational Force Affect a Snowball Fired from a Cliff?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the physics of a 1.50 kg snowball fired from a 12.5 m high cliff with an initial velocity of 14.0 m/s at an angle of 41.0 degrees. The work done by gravitational force during the snowball's flight is calculated using the formula Wg = mgd (cos theta), resulting in a positive work value due to the direction of gravity. The change in gravitational potential energy (PE) is determined to be -183.75 J, confirming that the change in PE does not depend on the choice of reference point, but rather on the change in height.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force and its direction
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Basic trigonometry for resolving forces and angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in classical mechanics
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy and its reference points
  • Explore the effects of projectile motion on objects launched at angles
  • Investigate the relationship between work done and energy transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in gravitational contexts.

Ginny Mac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A 1.50 kg snowball is fired from a cliff 12.5 m high. The snowball's initial velocity is 14.0 m/s, directed at 41.0 degrees above the horizontal. (a) How much work is done by the gravitational force during its flight to the flat ground below the cliff? (b) What is the change in gravitational potential energy of the snowball-Earth system during flight? (c) If the grav. potential energy is taken to be zero at the height of the cliff, what is its value when the snowball reaches the ground?

For (a), I have used
Wg= mgd (cos theta) to get Wg = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(12.5 m)(cos41), and arrived at -.987 J/m.

For (b), wouldn't this be indeterminate? I thought we needed a reference point for y to calculate the change in gravitational potential energy.

For (c), I used U-Uinitial = mg(y-yinitial), and arrived at -183.75 J. My reasoning is that the change in potential energy does not depend on choice of reference point for the snowball on the ground (at y=0), so instead it depends on change in y. Therefore, we get change in U = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0-12.5 m)=-183.75 J.

I think I am getting caught up and confused in physical properties, etc. Please help if I am wrong or please let me know if I am correct in my reasoning! Thank you so much.

Gin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ginny Mac said:
For (a), I have used
Wg= mgd (cos theta) to get Wg = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(12.5 m)(cos41), and arrived at -.987 J/m.
Realize that gravity acts straight down, not at an angle. And since the displacement and the force are in the same direction, the work done will be positive. And the units of work would be J, not J/m.

For (b), wouldn't this be indeterminate? I thought we needed a reference point for y to calculate the change in gravitational potential energy.
The change in gravitational potential energy does not depend on the reference point used. Pick any reference point you like. (If they ask, like in the next part, for the potential energy--not just the change--then they must give a reference point. And they did for part c.)

For (c), I used U-Uinitial = mg(y-yinitial), and arrived at -183.75 J. My reasoning is that the change in potential energy does not depend on choice of reference point for the snowball on the ground (at y=0), so instead it depends on change in y. Therefore, we get change in U = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0-12.5 m)=-183.75 J.
Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is a bit convoluted (no need to calculate changes in PE). The gravitational PE is given by mgy, where y is measured from the reference point. If the point in question is below the reference point, then y is negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K