Changing the base logarithms homework

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation log_2(x) + log_4(x) = 2, focusing on changing logarithm bases and exploring properties of logarithms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss changing the base of logarithms and explore various transformations of the original equation. Some express confusion about specific steps and seek clarification on logarithmic properties.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered different approaches to the problem, including changing the base and manipulating the equation using logarithmic identities. There is an ongoing exploration of the steps involved, with some participants requesting further explanations and foundational understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the properties of logarithms and their applications, indicating a need for clarification on definitions and operations related to logarithmic functions.

NewScientist
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
log_2(x) + log_4(x) = 2

I've tried everything i can think of, including changing the base - to no avail.

Any ideas?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's doable by changing base, but you can also do:

[tex]\log _2 x + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow 4^{\log _2 x + \log _4 x} = 4^2 \Leftrightarrow 4^{\log _2 x} 4^{\log _4 x} = 16 \Leftrightarrow x^2 \cdot x = 16[/tex]
 
Can you explain those steps to me because I don't really understand
 
- We raise both sides as exponents of base 4.
- Then we use the fact that [itex]a^{b + c} = a^b \cdot a^c[/itex]
- Then we can simplify the powers and logs because they are inverse operation.

Please specify what steps you have trouble with.

You can also do:

[tex]\log _2 x + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow \log _4 x^2 + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow \log _4 \left( {x \cdot x^2 } \right) = 2 \Leftrightarrow \log _4 \left( {x^3 } \right) = 2[/tex]

And then take 4^ again of both sides.
 
Here's how you can change base:
By definition, for y>0
[tex]y=2^{\log_{2}y}=4^{\log_{4}y}[/tex]
Thus, from the last identity, we get:
[tex]\log_{2}y\log_{4}2=\log_{4}y[/tex]
But:
[tex]2=4^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]
thus:
[tex]\log_{4}2=\log_{4}4^{\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]
or:
[tex]\log_{2}y=2\log_{4}y[/tex]
Thus, setting y=x, we have:
[tex]\log_{2}x+\log_{4}x=3\log_{4}x=\log_{4}x^{3}[/tex]
Your original equation is therefore:
[tex]\log_{4}x^{3}=2[/tex]
Or:
[tex]x^{3}=4^{2}[/tex]
which agrees with Tide's answer..
 
arildno said:
which agrees with Tide's answer..
Hmm, I've seen a Tide here, but it's not me :biggrin:
 
This is going to sound pathetic so i apologise but i do not know how these steps work!

[tex]\log _2 x + \log _4 x = 2 \Leftrightarrow 4^{\log _2 x + \log _4 x} = 4^2[/tex]

[tex]4^{\log _2 x} 4^{\log _4 x} = 16 \Leftrightarrow x^2 \cdot x = 16[/tex]

I'm really sorry but can you give me an anser for first principles - this isn't a requirement of the questoin but i actually want to understand this!
 
TD said:
Hmm, I've seen a Tide here, but it's not me :biggrin:
Allright tiddely-doo, I made a mistake okay! :cry:
I won't do it again.. :blushing:
 
Well, we use that:
[tex]\begin{gathered}<br /> a^{\log _a x} = x \hfill \\<br /> a^{b + c} = a^b \cdot a^c \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered}[/tex]
 
  • #10
i didn't know the result a^log_a(x) = x
 
  • #11
NewScientist said:
i didn't know the result a^log_a(x) = x
That is because they are by definition inverse operations.

[tex]a^{\log _a x} = x \Leftrightarrow \log _a \left( {a^{\log _a x} } \right) = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x \cdot \log _a a = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x = \log _a x[/tex]

So it is indeed correct.
 
  • #12
NewScientist said:
log_2(x) + log_4(x) = 2

I've tried everything i can think of, including changing the base - to no avail.

Any ideas?!
you probably know the formula
[tex]log_a (x^n) = n log_a (x)[/tex], where [tex]x>0[/tex]

There is a very useful similar formula:
[tex]log_{a^n} (x) = (1/n) log_a (x)[/tex]
(can be derived from [tex]log_a (x) = 1/ log_x (a)[/tex] ).

For your equation
[tex]log_2 (x) + log_4 (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex]log_2 (x) + log_{2^2} (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex]log_2 (x) + (1/2) log_2 (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex](3/2) log_2 (x) = 2[/tex]
[tex]log_2 (x) = 4/3[/tex]
[tex]x = 2^{4/3}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #13
TD said:
That is because they are by definition inverse operations.

[tex]a^{\log _a x} = x \Leftrightarrow \log _a \left( {a^{\log _a x} } \right) = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x \cdot \log _a a = \log _a x \Leftrightarrow \log _a x = \log _a x[/tex]

So it is indeed correct.
TD, actually this property is just a definition of logarithm:
[tex]{\log_a x}[/tex] is such a number [tex]n[/tex] that
[tex]a^{n} = x[/tex]
Substituting [tex]{\log_a x}[/tex] for [tex]n[/tex]
[tex]a^{\log_a x} = x[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Which is why I said "they are by definition inverse operations".

What came after that was just a way of using logarithm properties he might know to show that it is equal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K