Calculating Change in Kinetic Energy of 0.23kg Object

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the change in kinetic energy for a 0.23 kg object acted upon by a force of 0.50 N, resulting in a displacement of 0.88 m. The work done on the object is calculated as 0.44 J, leading to a change in kinetic energy of 0.44 J. The correct final velocity, derived from the kinetic energy equation, is determined to be 1.9 m/s. The initial confusion arose from a potential typo in the textbook regarding the expected velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Newton's Second Law and its applications in physics
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Practice problems involving kinetic energy and work calculations
  • Explore common errors in physics textbooks and how to identify them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in motion.

brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi I have a problem here and I am a little bit confused.

An object of mass 0.23kg is initially at tyhe origin and is acted on by the sole force F=(0.50 N)i. After a certain time, the object is at a position r=(.88m)i.
What is the change in the object's kinetic?


I tried to solve this problem by th equatiom Wnet=K, but I do not get the answer of the textbook. They found .89m/s .Apparently,it v. They did not specify.

Please can youhelp

Thank you for your time
B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, this makes no sense to me! If the object moves .88 m under a .5 N force, then it has had .44 J of work done on it. It's kinetic energy should have changed by .44 J. If, as you say, that was the sole force then we should have (1/2)(.23 kg) v2= 0.44. that gives v2= 0.88/.23= 3.8 so v= 1.9 m/s.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Sorry, this makes no sense to me! If the object moves .88 m under a .5 N force, then it has had .44 J of work done on it. It's kinetic energy should have changed by .44 J. If, as you say, that was the sole force then we should have (1/2)(.23 kg) v2= 0.44. that gives v2= 0.88/.23= 3.8 so v= 1.9 m/s.

Yes, I found the same result as you.
I must have a typo in my textbook.
Thank you anyway

B
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K