Projectile motion theta question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the critical launch angle theta for projectile motion, which separates two distinct motion types: one where the distance from the origin continuously increases and another where it first increases and then decreases. The user derived the position equation as r(t) = x^2 + y^2, with x = vcos(theta) and y = vsin(theta) - 4.9t^2. Through differentiation, they concluded that the dividing angle is approximately 71 degrees, suggesting that this angle is significant for understanding projectile motion behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Ability to manipulate and solve equations involving variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in detail
  • Learn about the implications of launch angles on projectile trajectories
  • Explore the concept of maximum height and range in projectile motion
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching projectile motion concepts, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of motion dynamics.

Ara macao
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A projectile is launched from origin at angle theta with horizontal, whose position is given by r(t). For small angles, distance from origin always increases. But if projectile is launched nearly straight up, it goes to a farthest point and then moves back down towards origin, so distance to origin first increases, then decreases. Which initial launch angle theta divides the two types of motion?

------------

I set up an equation of x^2+y^2 where x = vcostheta and y = vsintheta - 4.9x^2 and then took the derivative of it with respect to t, setting it equal to 0. However, that gets really messy and is there a better way to do it? I'm not sure about my answer anyways. Can someone please guide me though the process? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did manage to get an answer by doing the same things as you did (derivating and setting that 0).

It was surprisingly short, even though it seemed quite long at the beginning. I got 71 degrees, which seems somewhat logical (I'm telling this as you don't seem to have the correct answers in the book).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
28K
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K