Relative motion/ Vector Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a relative motion problem involving two ships, A and B, with specified positions and velocities. The original poster seeks assistance in determining the time at which the separation between the ships is minimized, having already completed parts A and B of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding the distance between the two ships as a function of time and suggest using derivatives to locate the minimum separation. There is mention of max-min problems and the need for a proper relationship between variables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using derivatives to find the minimum distance, while others are clarifying the steps involved in setting up the problem correctly. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to take, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that some participants may have varying levels of familiarity with calculus, particularly regarding derivatives and max-min problems, which could affect their contributions to the discussion.

suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
Please..give It A Try

"Ship A is located 4 km north and 2.5 km east of ship B. Ship A has a velocity of 22km/h towards the south and ship B has a velociy of 40 km/h in a direction of 37(degrees) north of east.
A)what is the velocity of A relative to B
B)write an expression for the position of A relative to B as a function of t, where t is equal to 0.
***C) at what time is the separation between the ships least?
Ive completed A and B..but i have no idea where to start for C..Can anyone help?

wellllllllll;
first i found the point of A relative to B=
...ans = [32km/h(t) + 2.5 km]i + [2.0km/h(t) + 4.0km]j
im guessing it has something to do with a max-min problem..but I am not sure where to start..i could do trial and error..but there has to be a simpler way..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you've done (B), then you can find the distance between A and B as a function of time by taking the magnitude of the vector expression in (B).

For example, if your answer for (B) is:

[tex]r(t) = x(t)i + y(t)j[/tex]

then

[tex]|r(t)| = \sqrt{x(t)^2 + y(t)^2}[/tex]

To find the minimum separation you need

[tex]\frac{d(|r(t)|)}{dt} = 0[/tex]

and solve for t. Then find |r| using the t value.

(Hint: since [itex]|r|[/itex] is a minimum when [itex]|r|^2[/itex] is a mimimum, you can alternatively solve [itex]d(|r|^2)/dt = 0[/itex] for t, which will be easier.)

Does that help?


Post restored.

--TM
[/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JamesR,

I've "soft deleted" your post. I'll restore it when suspenc3 shows some work.

I'm cracking down on the rules. :wink:
 
suspenc3 said:
im guessing it has something to do with a max-min problem..but I am not sure where to start..i could do trial and error..

You're right about it being a max-min problem, but you're wrong about needing to do it by trial and error.

How do you normally deal with max-min problems?
 
find the quantity were trying to minimize
find the variables involved
find a formula relating the quantity and the variables

This question is unlike most max min problems I've ever done
 
Last edited:
Have you taken Calculus I yet? The reason I'm asking is that you are forgetting a crucial step, and if you have had Calc I it should be obvious what that step is. Simply setting up a relationship isn't enough.

Do you know what I'm getting at?
 
Have you studied any calculus yet, in particular derivatives?
 
Yes I have..forgot that ppart..oops.its been a long time since I've dealt with min problems

so..
d= [32km/h(t)]i + [4km/h(t)]j..Take the derivative with respect to d?

or am i just way off
 
Last edited:
You're getting there. But you want to take the derivative with respect to t, not d.

I will now restore JamesR's post.
 
  • #10
yes this helps..but i still am a little fuzzy

r(t) = 32(t)i + 4(t)j...

0 = (radical of)[2(32t) + 2(4t)]
 
  • #11
suspenc3 said:
0 = (radical of)[2(32t) + 2(4t)]

No, you have to take the derivative first, and then set it equal to zero. In order to take the derivative you have to use the Chain Rule:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}[f(x)]^{\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{f'(x)}{[f(x)]^{1/2}}[/tex]
 
  • #12
R1(t) = {1/2[x(t)^2 + y(t)^2]^-1/2}{x(2t) + y(2t}

Ive been out of school for a few years..so I am not sure if this is correct

...0=72/18t..I must have done something wrong here!
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I've started to work the problem myself, and I see that your starting point is wrong. It is close to being correct though.

suspenc3 said:
first i found the point of A relative to B=
...ans = [32km/h(t) + 2.5 km]i + [2.0km/h(t) + 4.0km]j

You appear to have added the position vectors for A and B, when you should have subtracted them. The position of A relative to B is [itex]\vec{r}_{AB}=\vec{r}_A-\vec{r}_B[/itex].

I'd like for you to do the following:

1.) Clean up your expression for [itex]\vec{r}_{AB}[/itex], and then post it here.
2.) Obtain the expression for [itex]|\vec{r}_{AB}|[/itex], the distance between A and B, and post it here.

Then, we can get to work on taking that derivative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K