Fourier Transform of Probability distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the probability function by inverting its Fourier transform, specifically addressing the equation P(X>x) = 1/2 + (1/π) ∫(0 to ∞) Re[e^(-iθx)f(θ)/(iθ)] dθ, where f(θ) is the characteristic function. The main query revolves around the origin of the 1/2 term in the equation. The user attempts to calculate the Fourier transform of the indicator function I_{X>x} and relates it to the characteristic function, but struggles to understand the contribution of the 1/2 term from the Fourier inversion process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with characteristic functions in probability theory
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, particularly integrals involving real and imaginary parts
  • Basic concepts of probability distributions and indicator functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Fourier transform of probability distributions
  • Learn about the properties of characteristic functions in probability theory
  • Explore the significance of the zero frequency component in Fourier transforms
  • Investigate the application of inverse Fourier transforms in deriving probability functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and data scientists interested in advanced probability theory, particularly those working with Fourier transforms and characteristic functions.

sam2
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Sorry about the text, but Latex doesn't work.

Can anyone please give me an outline for the derivation of the probability function by inverting its Fourier transform, i.e.

P(X>x) = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} Re \bigg[\frac{e^{-i \theta x}f(\theta)}{i \theta} \bigg] d\theta

where f is the characteristic function.
Basically, I do not understand where the 1/2 comes from. My approach was to calculate the Fourier transform of the probabity function:

E \big[ I_{X>x} \big]

and this reduces to being a function of the characteristic function as shown above (f/i theta). I then inverted the Fourier transform and got the integral above. But I don't see where the 1/2 would come from.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to play [ tex ] ... [ /tex ] around your LaTeX code. (Without the spaces, of course... and note that it's / and not \)
 
Remember that something special happens at the frequency 0 component of the Fourier transform...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K