At what points is the potential zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the points along the line joining a 2.9 µC charge at x = 0 and a -2.0 µC charge at x = 3.5 cm where the electric field and electric potential are zero. The user initially miscalculated the positions of the charges, placing the 2.9 µC charge at x = -0.55 cm instead of the correct position at x = 0. The correct approach involves setting the electric field equations equal to each other and solving for x, followed by applying the principles of electric potential to find the zero potential points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's Law
  • Knowledge of quadratic equations
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its application in electric field calculations
  • Study the concept of electric potential and how to calculate it for point charges
  • Practice solving quadratic equations in the context of physics problems
  • Explore the superposition principle in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in electrostatics, particularly in calculating electric fields and potentials in systems with multiple charges.

Kali8972
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone could help get me started on this problem. I thought I knew how to solve it but keep coming up with the wrong answer:

A 2.9 µC is at x = 0 and a -2.0 µC charge is at x = 3.5 cm. (Let V = 0 at r = .)

(a) At what point along the line joining them is the electric field zero?
x = cm
(b) At what points is the potential zero?
x = cm (smaller x value)
x = cm (larger x value)


a) [(2.9e-6 C)k]/(.055+ x)^2 = [k(2e-6)]/(x^2)

k's cancel.. and then use quadratic to find it but the values aren't the right ones... What am I missing?

Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kali8972 said:
a) [(2.9e-6 C)k]/(.055+ x)^2 = [k(2e-6)]/(x^2)

Your problem is that you've got the [itex]2.9\mu C[/itex] charge sitting at x=-0.55cm, and you've got the [itex]-2\mu C[/itex] charge sitting at the origin.

(edited for typos)
 
well yeah I guess that would make things a little more difficult! haha thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
880
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K