Speed of Block at Top of Track: Solving Friction Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter AdnamaLeigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a block at the top of a vertical circular track after being pushed by a spring and experiencing friction. The block has a mass of 0.5 kg and is propelled from a spring with a constant of 553 N/m, achieving a speed of 14 m/s at the bottom of the track. The average frictional force acting on the block is 6 N while it ascends the track. The correct approach to solve for the speed at the top involves accounting for the work done by friction as negative energy, leading to the conclusion that the speed at the top cannot exceed the speed at the bottom.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of work done by friction
  • Basic grasp of circular motion dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy principle in mechanics
  • Learn about energy conservation in systems with friction
  • Explore the effects of friction on circular motion
  • Review calculations involving spring potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion involving springs and friction in circular tracks.

AdnamaLeigh
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
A block of mass .5kg is pushed against a horizontal spring of negligible mass, compressing the spring a distance of Δx (I solved for this and got .421m) as shown in the figure. The spring constant is 553N/m. When released, the block travels along a frictionless horizontal surface to point B, the bottom of the vertical circular track of radius .7m, and continues to move up the track. The speed of the block at the bottom of the track is 14m/s, and the block experiences an average frictional force of 6N while sliding up the track.
What is the speed of the block at the top of the track?
I know that normally the change in kinetic energy is equal to potential energy, but this is the not the case due to friction. This is the formula I used:
(6)(pi)(.7) - (1.4)(9.8)(.5) = .5(.5)v^2 - .5(.5)(14)^2
The 2nd half of the equation is equal to the change in kinetic energy. The 1.4 stuff is equal to the potential energy (m*g*h) But I'm really confused as what to do with the friction. I just multiplied the force of friction with half of the circumference.
I don't know how else to approach this, but I know it's wrong because my answer was 14.9m/s and the speed shouldn't be greater on top than bottom. This is frustrating. Thanks for any help.
 

Attachments

  • figure.jpg
    figure.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 444
Physics news on Phys.org
You're approach is OK, you are just messing up with signs. The change in energy (KE + PE) between bottom and top equals the work done by friction (which is negative).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K