- #1
- 8,252
- 2,664
http://minibytes.mondominishows.com/poo/affiliates/play.asp?Affil=iwon&W
For all of my special friends at PF.
For all of my special friends at PF.
Last edited by a moderator:
Flaming Bag of Poo Game - Play Now!
- Thread starter Ivan Seeking
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The thread revolves around a humorous online game titled "Flaming Bag of Poo," with participants sharing their experiences and reactions to the game. The discussion includes playful banter, reactions to the game's content, and commentary on the nature of entertainment.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express amusement at the game, sharing their initial confusion about how to play, specifically regarding the need to click "stomp."
- There are multiple reactions to the game's content, with some participants finding it gross, particularly the inclusion of candy corn in the "poo."
- Websense categorizes the game as "entertainment," but some participants argue it may be more appropriately labeled as "tasteless."
- A discussion arises about the nature of entertainment and whether something can be considered tasteless if it still attracts an audience.
- Participants engage in light-hearted exchanges about the meaning of "lmao," with differing interpretations presented.
- One participant humorously notes the presence of spam in the thread, leading to further playful commentary.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
The discussion features a mix of agreement on the humorous aspects of the game and disagreement regarding its tastefulness and categorization as entertainment. No consensus is reached on whether the game is entertaining or tasteless.
Contextual Notes
Participants express varying opinions on the game's content and its classification, indicating a lack of clear definitions for what constitutes entertainment versus tastelessness.
- #2
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 11,959
- 54
And of course I click on the link...and sit there staring at it waiting for something to happen...then it dawns on me that I'm supposed to click "stomp." 
- #3
coffee na lang dear
- 25
- 0
hahhaha...- #4
Gale
- 683
- 1
EW. you're gross ivan.
- #5
russ_watters
Mentor
- 23,876
- 11,345
Mmmmmmm. Moonpie.Moonbear said:And of course I click on the link...and sit there staring at it waiting for something to happen...then it dawns on me that I'm supposed to click "stomp."
- #6
mattmns
- 1,129
- 5
lmao, I seriously did the exact same thing!Moonbear said:And of course I click on the link...and sit there staring at it waiting for something to happen...then it dawns on me that I'm supposed to click "stomp."
- #7
Mk
- 2,040
- 4
lmao (whatever that means), I seriously did the same thing too!mattmns said:
- #8
- 8,252
- 2,664
Did anyone notice the candy corn in the poo?
- #9
Gale
- 683
- 1
ya... GROSS! bleck!
- #10
Mk
- 2,040
- 4
Some people only like to bite off the tops.Ivan Seeking said:Did anyone notice the candy corn in the poo?
- #11
TheStatutoryApe
- 301
- 3
Websense says that it falls under "entertainment" but from what it sounds like it probably belongs under "tasteless". 
- #12
mattmns
- 1,129
- 5
lmao = Laughing My Ass OffMk said:
- #13
Mk
- 2,040
- 4
Oh, then I wouldn't have typed that.
- #14
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 11,959
- 54
TheStatutoryApe said:Websense says that it falls under "entertainment" but from what it sounds like it probably belongs under "tasteless".
Does it let you view entertainment that isn't tasteless? Otherwise, is there any point in even plugging the computer into the internet? There's not much left if it filters out both entertainment and tasteless. - #15
Mk
- 2,040
- 4
Can entertainment be tasteless? Someone must have the taste for it, or it would not be entertainment, it would be... unentertaining, meaning no one has a taste for it. If I were to use this metaphor too many times than I should.
- #16
zanazzi78
- 115
- 1
mattmns said:
I always thought it mean
In My (Aging) Opinion
- #17
coffee na lang dear
- 25
- 0
zanazzi78 said:
- #18
hypatia
- 1,191
- 10
wow someone spammed the poo thread!
- #19
mattmns
- 1,129
- 5
Yeah and they did not even check to see whether or not the board supported html
- #20
- 8,252
- 2,664
hypatia said:wow someone spammed the poo thread!
OH NO! POO SPAM!
I showed this to Tsu and waited for a comment. Silence. I pointed out that a couple of members thought it was pretty tasteless. "So you don't like it either", I asked. "Oh", she replied, "I'm just trying to think of who to sent it to".
Similar threads
- · Replies 7 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 9 ·
- · Replies 2 ·