Springs I've been working on this for several hours

  • Thread starter Thread starter DKPeridot20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Springs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a 2 kg block falling at 29 m/s from a height of 3.0 meters onto a spring with a constant of 4.00E3 N/m. The user has applied kinematic equations to determine the velocity upon impact, the distance compressed, and the velocity and displacement during the ascent. Despite close calculations, the user is seeking clarification on potential energy changes and the accuracy of their results, suspecting a rounding issue may be the cause of their discrepancy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Knowledge of spring mechanics and Hooke's Law
  • Familiarity with gravitational potential energy concepts
  • Basic algebra for rearranging equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of conservation of energy in spring systems
  • Study the effects of rounding errors in physics calculations
  • Learn about the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy
  • Explore advanced kinematic equations for motion involving springs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding energy transformations in spring systems.

DKPeridot20
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
*sigh* I'm SURE there is a perfectly reasonable solution to this problem, unfortunately for me it remains just beyond the next horizon. :cry:

The green block (2 kg) is falling at a speed of 29. m/s and is 3.0 meters above the spring. The spring constant is 4.00E3 N/m. What is the maximum hsight that the block will rise after it hits and leaves the spring (use g=9.81 m/s^2)?

I have
1) found v when it hits the spring by v^2 = Vnot^2 + 2a(change in)x
2) found distance compressed by (final rearrangement) d = v(sq rt of)m/k
3) found v on the way up by (final rearrangement)
v = (sq rt of) kd^2/2 - mgd
4) found displacement on the way up by (final rearrangement)
(change in)x = v^2 - vnot^2 / 2a

and I come VERY close to the right answer, but not quite there. What am I doing wrong and how can I fix it, please?

Also, how does the change in gravitational potential energy apply in this situation and what exactly is it?

Thanks so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if you came very close to the answer, it might be a rounding issue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K