How Does NASA Shield Robots and Metals from Space Radiation?

  • Context: NASA 
  • Thread starter Thread starter varungreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shielding Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on how NASA protects its robots and metals from space radiation, particularly focusing on the shielding of electronics and the effects of radiation on metals used in space applications. Participants explore various aspects of radiation shielding, the impact of radiation on materials, and the specific technologies employed in space missions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about NASA's methods for shielding robots and electronics from solar radiation, questioning whether radiation has negligible effects on these systems.
  • It is noted that NASA and military applications utilize radiation-hardened microchips designed to function in radiation environments, with shielding being a trade-off with mass.
  • One participant mentions that the satellite structure itself can serve as a form of shielding, and that radiation impacts microelectronics more significantly than structural materials.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of radiation on metals, with claims that metals may become brittle due to high-energy particles ionizing atoms and creating dislocations in the crystal lattice.
  • Another participant discusses the phenomenon of 'vacuum lock' in metal machinery, suggesting it relates to van der Waals forces and the need for special lubricants in vacuum conditions.
  • There are references to the historical context of these issues, particularly in earlier space missions, and the evolution of technology and materials used in modern spacecraft.
  • Some participants provide links to external resources for further reading on radiation effects and shielding technologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the effectiveness of shielding and the impact of radiation on materials, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the specifics of radiation effects or the best methods for shielding.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the trade-offs involved in shielding design, the saturation of embrittlement effects with radiation dose, and the need for specialized lubricants in vacuum conditions, but do not resolve the complexities of these issues.

varungreat
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
1. how does NASA protect its robots in space(eg satellites, space stations etc) from solar radiation ?
( their processors, chips etc )
I've checked lot of sites for it but none of them mentioned about their shielding. does this mean that radiation have negligible effects on robots??

2. how does radiation affect metals in space?
I've heard that metals become brittle. is it true?
If yes then by what rate?? how to protect them them??

somebody PLEASE HELP!:bugeye:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This might help. http://www.northerndiecast.com/emi.htm"
http://www.eas.asu.edu/~holbert/eee460/spacerad.html"

http://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/books/apollo/S2ch3.htm"

Electronics can be shielded from electromagnetic waves with the help of metals because of metals' conductivity.

Also since a lot of the satellites are near Earth, the solar radiation dose is highly reduced in comparision to open space. The rest is absorbed through appopriate shielding.

Magnetic shielding is an option but as of now, still untested. We have little experience with superconducting electromagnets in open space.

I should also note that even with high shielding, a person in say Apollo 11 would experience much more radiation than a person on Earth. However because he doesn't have to stay in space forever, the net radiation dose will cause little harm. The same applies to electronics. An exposure to space without shielding would likely have little effect on electronics. A prolonged exposure would likely spoil them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
varungreat said:
1. how does NASA protect its robots in space(eg satellites, space stations etc) from solar radiation ?
( their processors, chips etc )
I've checked lot of sites for it but none of them mentioned about their shielding. does this mean that radiation have negligible effects on robots??
Basically, NASA and military use radiation hardened microchips which are specially designed to operate in radiation fields. Shielding involves a trade off with mass. Basically one can use the satellite structure as shielding. Radiation affects the microelectronics more signficantly than the structural materials.

Space Radiation Effects on Integrated Circuits - http://parts.jpl.nasa.gov/asic/Appendix.3.html

Design for Radiation Tolerance - http://parts.jpl.nasa.gov/asic/Sect.3.4.html#rad.hard.1

The RAD750 microprocessor is specifically developed for radiation environment - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAD750

http://www.baesystems.com/newsroom/2002/feb/040202news1.htm

varungreat said:
2. how does radiation affect metals in space?
i've heard that metals become brittle. is it true?
If yes then by what rate?? how to protect them them??
somebody PLEASE HELP!:bugeye:
In space, high energy particles ionize the atoms and knock them out of equilibrium position in the crystal lattice - and this is the same problem in nuclear reactors. The knocking of atoms produces higher levels of dislocations in the structure, which becomes somewhat stronger, but also more brittle. One simply designs the structure with this in mind.

The embrittelment of a metal tends to saturate with dose (integral of dose rate with respect to time), i.e. the dislocation density essentially saturates. We now have correlations of material properties, e.g. hardness and strength, with respect to dose - or displacements per atom (dpa).
 
I've also seen something about 'vacuum lock' of metal machinery. I believe that it has to do with van der Waals forces siezing parts up when there's no air between them. Special very broad temperature-range lubricants are required. Can you elaborate, Astro?
 
I know that was an issue back in the days of Mercury, Gemini, Apollo and Skylab - before ISS. I don't know how big an issue it is these days.

I believe is related to simple atomic (primarily surface) diffusion between surfaces in contact, especially warm or heated surfaces.

I searched for a good discussion or paper of the phenomenon, but couldn't find one. You're right Danger, there are special lubricants for vacuum and a broad temperature range.
 
thanx.
but for lubricating do we require air as a medium??o:)
 
No. Most lubricants, in fact, preclude air as well as moisture. That's why they also work as metal preservatives.
 
Thanx For The Info :-)
 
Astronuc said:
Basically, NASA and military use radiation hardened microchips which are specially designed to operate in radiation fields. Shielding involves a trade off with mass. Basically one can use the satellite structure as shielding. Radiation affects the microelectronics more signficantly than the structural materials.
Space Radiation Effects on Integrated Circuits - http://parts.jpl.nasa.gov/asic/Appendix.3.html
Design for Radiation Tolerance - http://parts.jpl.nasa.gov/asic/Sect.3.4.html#rad.hard.1
The RAD750 microprocessor is specifically developed for radiation environment - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAD750
http://www.baesystems.com/newsroom/2002/feb/040202news1.htm

A shameless plug for my research group since we work on radiation shielding of Solar Particle Events, Trapped Radiation (Van Allen radiation) and Galatic Cosmic Rays:
http://csmb.larc.nasa.gov/csmbexternal/home.htm

I know- shameless.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
11K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
15K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K