Does Integrating a Discrete Function Over All Space Equal Its Infinite Sum?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between integrals and sums of discrete functions, specifically whether the integral of a discrete function w(x) over all space equals its infinite sum. The integral is defined as \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} w(x) f(x) \, dx, while the sum is \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} w(n) f(n). It is concluded that if w is a distribution, the equality holds true, expressed as w(x) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} g(n) \delta(x - n), where g is defined on the integers. The discussion emphasizes that for general functions f, such an equality cannot be established without the use of distributions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann and Stieltjes integrals
  • Familiarity with discrete functions and distributions
  • Knowledge of delta functions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of generalized functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Stieltjes integrals and their applications
  • Learn about distributions and generalized functions in mathematical analysis
  • Explore the role of delta functions in signal processing and physics
  • Investigate the implications of discrete versus continuous functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of advanced calculus or functional analysis who are exploring the connections between discrete and continuous mathematical concepts.

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
let be the function w(x) that only takes discrete values in the sense that is only defined for x=n being n an integer..then my question is if the integral:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxw(x)f(x)[/tex]

would be equal to the sum of the serie:

[tex]\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}w(n)f(n)[/tex]


if the sum and integral would be equal imply that the function

[tex]w(x)=g(x)\sum_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta(x-n)[/tex]



thanks...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if you mean the Stieljes integral.

Where the Riemann integral [itex]\int_a^b f(x)dx[/itex] is defined by partitioning the interval from a to b into many small intervals, {xi}, choosing x* in each interval, forming the sum [itex]\Sigma f(x*)(x_{n+1}- x{n})[/itex] and taking the limit as the interval is partioned into more and more intervals, the Stieljes (or Riemann-Stieljes) integral, [itex]\int_a^b f(x)d\alpha(x)[/itex] does the same thing but uses the sum [itex]\Sigma f(x*)(\alpha(x_{n+1})- \alpha(x{n}))[/itex] where [itex]\alpha(x)[/itex] can be any increasing function. If [itex]\alpha(x)[/itex] is differentiable, that gives simply the Riemann integral [itex]\int_a^bf(x)\frac{d\alpha}{dx}dx[/itex] but if [itex]\alpha[/itex] is a step function, say the greatest integer function, then it gives the sum [itex]\Sigma_{n=a}^{b} f(n)[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It sounds like your initial sentence is saying:

Let w be a function whose domain is the integers. I.E. w(x) is defined only when x is an integer.

In that case, the integral

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} w(x) f(x) \, dx[/tex]

is not even defined.

---------------------------------------------------

Let me pose another question, the one I think you meant to ask:

If we're given a function g that is defined on the integers (and not always zero), can we find a function w such that:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} w(x) f(x) \, dx<br /> =<br /> \sum_{n = -\infty}^{+\infty} g(n) f(n)[/tex]

is true for all functions f? The answer is no.

However, if we let w be a distribution (or generalized function), then we can find such a w, and it can be given by the sum

[tex] w(x) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty} g(n) \delta(x - n)[/tex]

If g is also defined at every real number, the above expression is indeed the same as

[tex] w(x) = g(x) \sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta(x - n)[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K