Find Change in Momentum: 2.00kg Object, 25 m/s, 30° Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 2.00-kg object striking a frictionless steel plate at a speed of 25.0 m/s and an angle of 30°, then rebounding at an angle of 25°. The objective is to find the vector change in momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of initial and final momentum vectors using trigonometric functions. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the subtraction of these vectors and the interpretation of the impulse delivered by the plate.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations for the change in momentum components and are exploring the implications of the hint regarding the y-component of impulse. There is ongoing dialogue about the assumptions made regarding the x-momentum and the final velocity of the object.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not explicitly state that the final velocity equals the initial velocity, leading to confusion about the momentum components. The hint from the book suggests that the impulse only has a y-component, prompting further examination of the x-component's relevance.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
A 2.00-kg object with speed of 25.0 m/s strikes a frictionless steel plate at an angle of 30.0o and rebounds at 25.0o. Find the vector change in momentum pf-pi.
Here is a link to the image: http://img500.imageshack.us/img500/2681/171812nv.gif

I found the initial momentum to be [itex]\left(50\cos{30^o},-50\sin{30^o}\right)[/itex] and the final momentum to be [itex]\left(50\cos{25^o},50\sin{25^o}\right)[/itex]. To find the change, I just subtracted these, but the answer is incorrect. Note: The method I used to find the initial and final vectors was to multiply the magnitude of the velocity by sine and cosine respectively, and then by 2 (the mass).

Can someone give me a hint as to where I went wrong?

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What values did you get when you subtracted these momenta?

(Did you subtract the negative)
 
Yes, I did. This is what I came up with (rounded off):

[tex]\Delta\vec{p}=\left<2.01,46.1\right>\text{N}-\text{s}[/tex]

...I hope it's just an arithmetic error. Please let me know what you think if you get a chance.

Thanks again! :smile:
 
∆px = px`-px = 50cos25[E]-50cos30[E] ≈ 2.014[E]

∆py = py`-py = 50sin25[N]-50sin30 = 50sin25+50sin30[N] ≈ 46.131 [N]

Now you know the horizontal and verticial components of the impulse, but you need to add the vectors together to find the total impulse. Drawing these 2 vectors will form a right triangle in which you can use pythagorean theorem to find the total impulse.
 
Last edited:
I need to find the vector change though, not the magnitude.
 
You mean the horizontal and vertical changes in momentum? Your answer looks correct then. What answer does your book give?
 
Erwin Schrödinger said:
You mean the horizontal and vertical changes in momentum? Your answer looks correct then. What answer does your book give?
I don't have an answer for it, but it does give me a hint. It says that the impulse delivered to the mass by the plate only has a y-component. Does this mean I can get rid of my x component and use the y? For this problem, does that hint mean I would use (0,46.1) instead of (2.01,46.1)?

Thanks again.
 
Hmm, that's strange. If ∆px = 0, then px` = px but that clearly isn't the case here since the angle of incidence and the angle of deflection are not equal. I don't see how they can make that claim. I'm just as stumped as you are now.
 
Hmm... I found the answer, which is the one I suggested above (0,46.1). I find that strange as well, but I guess I'll just have to work with some similar problems.

Thanks a lot for your help.
 
  • #10
Dang! I was just coming back to this to point out that the frictionless steel surface could not have changed the x-momentum of the ball.

Therefore, the final speed could not be 50 m/s because 50 cos30 has to equal 2*v'*cos 25. From this you find v'.
 
  • #11
Oh okay, I see the problem we both made here. We assumed that the final velocity of the ball was equal to the inital velocity but the question didn't state that. Tricky...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K