Solving Complex No. Query with Geometric Series and Double Angle Formulae

  • Thread starter Thread starter sachi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a complex number equation involving geometric series and double angle formulas. The original poster presents a series and its proof, followed by a complex equation that they are attempting to solve using previous results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the equation x^4 - x^2 + 1/16 = 0 to the previously established results involving cos(4y) and geometric series. They express uncertainty about how to proceed with this connection. Some participants suggest alternative values for cos(4y) and point out relationships between trigonometric identities and the equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants offering suggestions and clarifications. The original poster acknowledges a mistake in their approach and notes that the solutions align when corrected. There seems to be a productive exchange of ideas, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's confusion regarding the correct value for cos(y) and its implications for solving the equation. The context includes the use of trigonometric identities and complex numbers, which may impose constraints on the methods discussed.

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
the first two parts of this question are easy to prove:

1 + cosy/2+ cos(2y)/4 + cos(3y)/8 ... =(4-2cosy)/(5-4cosy)

this can be done using infinite geometric series, and taking the real part.

Then cos(4y) =8({(cosy)^4} -{(cosy)^2}) + 1

which can be done using double angle formulae.

Now we need to solve

x^4 - x^2 + 1/16 = 0

This can be done easily using complex no's, but I'm not sure how to do it using the previous results. I've tried setting cos(4y) = 1/16, and then letting x=cosy, but I end up with some horrible expression involving cos(0.25*arcos(1/16)) which is obviously not what I'm supposed to get.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try putting [tex]\cos(4y) = 1/2[/tex].

Carl
 
You notice that:

(cos y)^4 - (cos y)^2 + (1/8)(1 - cos 4y) = 0?
 
thanks v. much. i was probably suffering some sort of miniature brain death by putting cosy = 1/16 (instead of cosy = 1/2!) The trig solution and the completing the square solutions match up as well, so it all work out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K