Satellite Motion and Electric Fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around satellite motion and electric fields, specifically focusing on the relationship between the orbital period of satellites and their radius, as well as the behavior of a charged sphere in a uniform electric field created by two conducting plates.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the value of K relating the moon's orbit to that of a geostationary satellite, expressing uncertainty about their calculation. They also question the behavior of a charged sphere in a changing electric field.
  • Some participants explore assumptions regarding orbital periods and the implications of Kepler's Law on the problem.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the relationship between electric field strength and the motion of the charged sphere as the plates move.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about assumptions and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between orbital periods and distances, as well as the behavior of electric fields, but no consensus has been reached on the calculations or interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the periods of satellites and the initial conditions of the electric field. The original poster's uncertainty about their calculations and the implications of the electric field's behavior are noted.

KatieKangaroo
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The period T of an Earth satellite is related to the radius R of its orbit by the equation T^2 = A R^3 where A is a constant. The moon may be assumed to move in a circular orbit of radius RM about earth. The period of the moon's orbit is 28 days. The radius of the orbit of a geostationary satellite about Earth is Rg. The orbital radii are related by the expression: RM = K Rg
Find the value of K.
I found K to be 3.04 but am not sure if i have done it correctly. Can anyone help?

Also, a constant potential difference is applied beteen two conducting plates creating a uniform electric field. A very small negatively charged sphere is introduced between the plates. It is found that the values of the weight of the sphere, the charge on it and the electric field between the plates are such as to cause it to remain stationary. At time t=0 the upper plate starts to move with uniform velocity towards the lower plate. The potential difference is kept constant, and the plates remain parallel throughout the motion.
Sketch a graph to show the variation of the electric field strength E between the plates with time t. As E = voltage/distance, I drew a straight line through the origin. Is this correct?
Describe what happens to the charged sphere while the upper plate is moving.
I have said that the charged sphere would accelerate towards the positive plate as the electric field strength would be increasing, because the electric force no longer balances with the charge and the weight of the sphere. Don't think this is correct though. Can anyone suggest how I would answer this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone help me out?
 
I don't know how to do this, but I took a guess.

I assumed that something moving in an orbit equal to the Earth's Radius would have a period, T, equal to 24 hrs, or 1 day. Is that correct ?

Assuming that's correct then ...

Tg² = ARg³
1 = ARg³
A = 1/Rg³

therefore,

T = (R/Rg)³
=========

when R = Rm,

T² = (Rm/Rg)³
28² = (K)³
K = 9.2208
========

But that value is the square of 3.04, your value.
Did you square the 28 when you did your calculation ?
 
Fermat said:
I assumed that something moving in an orbit equal to the Earth's Radius would have a period, T, equal to 24 hrs, or 1 day. Is that correct ?

That isn't necessarily true. However, "geostationary" means stationary with respect to the Earth, so a geostationary satellite will have an orbital period of 24 hours, whatever its orbital radius.
 
Thanks for the update :smile:
 
Well, 23 hours 56 minutes and... 4 seconds is it? But close enough!
 
Kepler's Law has the distance ratio cubed = the period ratio squared.
your period ratio is 28, so the distance ratio should be cuberoot(784).

The Electric Field at the start of the motion is NOT zero, but some E.
The strength does increase linearly at first, doubling as the distance is halved.
as time goes by, to 3/4 of the time till the plates touch, E = 4 E_o .
By the time the plates would touch the E-field would be infinite.

Yea, the Electric Force (which must be up) would become stronger than
the (downward) gravity Force, so the ball accelerates upward (toward + plate)
 
thank you all for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K