Solve Calculus Problem: Find Shortest Ladder Length

  • Thread starter Thread starter AD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the shortest length of a ladder that can reach a building over a fence. The scenario includes a 6ft high fence located 2ft away from the building, and the relationship between the ladder's length, its height on the building, and its distance from the fence is explored through calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss expressing the ladder length as a function of height or distance, considering similar triangles, and differentiating to find minimum values. Questions arise about simplifying the differentiation process and whether there are easier functions to work with.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to differentiate the function for the ladder length. Some suggest focusing on the square of the length to simplify calculations, while others are clarifying the steps needed to derive the function correctly. There is a collaborative effort to refine the mathematical expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available and the methods they can use. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify mathematical expressions and the differentiation process.

AD
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Not my own homework problem, but somebody else's.

Parallel to a tall building runs a 6ft high fence. It is 2ft away from the building. What is the shortest ladder needed to reach the building from the other side of the fence?

I've drawn a diagram for this problem (see attached).

I've called the height above the ground at which the ladder touches the building 'h' and the distance of the base of the ladder from the fence 'x' and the length of the ladder 'L'.

Then

L2 = h2 + (x + 2)2

I think that by expressing L as a function in terms of one of the variables, x or h, and differentiating with respect to that variable, I can find then find the minimum length of the ladder.

By considering similar triangles

6/x = h/(2 + x)

So

x = 12/(h - 6)

And

h = 12/x + 6

But by substituting in either of these values, the differentiation dL/dx or dL/dh becomes horrible.

Is there an easier way to solve this problem? Am I overlooking something? I'd like to see if I could find an easier function to differentiate.
 

Attachments

  • ladder.gif
    ladder.gif
    2 KB · Views: 592
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the trick: Look for an extremum of L2. You know that L is positive, so an extremum of L2 is also an extremum of L.
I've tried
[tex] \frac{d}{dh}L^2 = 0[/tex]
It's lengthy but easy.

Edit: I think the rest of your work is OK.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so I can do dL2/dx or dL2/dh rather than and dL/dx or dL/dh and that will make the maths easier.

You've suggested dL2/dh.

Substituting x = 12/(h - 6) into the equation for L2 means that I would have to differentiate

h2 + [(12/(h - 6)) + 2]2

with respect to h. Right?
 
Correct.
Simplify before you derive. A lot of things will cancel.:wink:
 
So

L2 = h2 + [(12/(h - 6)) + 2]2

= h2 + 144/[(h - 6)2] + 48/(h - 6) + 4

What's cancelling?
 
Oh, c'mon. Combine the fractions before you square!
 
To get

L2 = h2 + 4h2/(h - 6)2

...?

Can I simplify it further?
 
I think this will do. Next, derive...
 
How? Using the quotient rule for the second term? Is that what you did?
 
  • #10
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K