Forensic Files: Crime Solving TV Show Fans Unite

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrOrange99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    files
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around participants' experiences and opinions regarding forensic and crime-solving television shows, particularly focusing on "Forensic Files," "CSI," and other similar series. The scope includes personal enjoyment, realism versus dramatization, and the impact of these shows on public perception of forensic science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express enjoyment in trying to solve cases alongside the shows, while others find that increased knowledge diminishes their enjoyment.
  • Several participants criticize the unrealistic portrayal of forensic science in shows like "CSI," noting that it often simplifies complex processes and includes blatant inaccuracies.
  • Some argue that the dramatization in these shows can inspire interest in science among viewers, particularly younger audiences.
  • There are mentions of specific inaccuracies, such as the portrayal of DNA testing and contamination issues in laboratory techniques shown on screen.
  • Participants share a preference for non-fiction crime shows that present real cases without the dramatization typical of scripted series.
  • Humor is noted as a common response to the inaccuracies, with some participants finding entertainment in the flaws of the shows.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the unrealistic aspects of forensic shows, but there is no consensus on whether this detracts from their enjoyment or serves a different purpose, such as inspiring interest in science.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific inaccuracies and limitations in the portrayal of forensic science, highlighting a disconnect between real-life practices and their representation in media.

Who May Find This Useful

Fans of forensic and crime-solving television shows, individuals interested in the portrayal of science in media, and those curious about public perceptions of forensic science may find this discussion relevant.

MrOrange99
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't watch a lot of tv, but when I do it usually has to be something that makes me think, lol. I was wondering if anyone else watches these kinds of shows (forensic, crimesolving).

Forensic Files kind of an obscure show but I am really hooked. I like to try to "put the facts together" before they solve it on the show. But most of the time I am clueless.

Who else is into this kind of thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I watch CSI(all there) I somtimes watch show's about real muder mystires(but not as much as use to)Numbers and Monk
 
I used to watch forensic files about 2 or 3 years ago, and I liked it. Personally I watch Law and Order: Criminal Intent.

I think the more you know about something, the less fun the show becomes. After volunteering in a crime lab for about 6 months, watching CSI just did not feel real anymore.
 
I find that too. I used to love science shows as a kid. Now I hardly ever watch a science documentary unless it is something I know nothing about. I can't stand them, the way it is all dumbed down, and in a lot of them the number of things they get blatently wrong.
 
I liek forensic files and those kind of shows, (city confidential). I think CSI is crap
 
The more you learn, the more you realize these shows are total BS. Think you can match bullets to guns? You can't; the gun barrel changes after every single shot. DNA tests for every damn thing that comes along? No way, DNA testing is expensive, so it's rarely done. You can't run an IR on a mixture of things and get an answer, that's like trying to determine the individual components in scummy water by looking at it.
CSI pisses me off. In one episode, the dude actually said "two pro-pan-wun". Do you mean aceteone? Idiot.

Other shows like City Confidential are still good. Just a nice story from start to finish without any of the name dropping CSI crap.
 
ShawnD said:
In one episode, the dude actually said "two pro-pan-wun". Do you mean aceteone? Idiot.
:smile: I just suspend my thinking to watch those shows and enjoy them, but blatant mistakes like that crack me up, so for me, it's part of the fun of watching (hey, I know they're actors not real scientists). If you saw all the science fair projects inspired by shows like CSI, you'd realize that even if the show is flawed, you can appreciate it for inspiring kids to get interested in science (the projects were testing to see if things in the show really worked...the usual answer is "a little, but not like it did in the show").

But, yeah, they make everything seem so much easier and glamorous than it really is. I love how they run DNA samples with nothing to match it to, as if that's going to tell you anything (though, in some shows, it really has improved, where they acknowledge they don't have any matches for it), or just that something that takes 2 days to process in the real world can be "rushed" and done in 2 hours in TV world...I wish! I also have fun watching when they are showing someone actually doing a technique...they'll be wearing floppy gloves two sizes too big, rub their face with the gloved hand, grab a pipet tip with that gloved hand to stick it on the pipet, stick the pipet straight into the upright tube containing the only sample...yep, that one's contaminated.
 
I watch all of the CSI's, Law & Orders, etc.., but for entertainment only. Never heard of Forensic Files. One nice one that airs on Access here is called 'The New Detectives', which offers re-enactments of real cases (3 per episode), along with interviews with the real case officers and forsensics people who worked on them.
 
but you watch them to make sure it isn't your house being surrounded
 
  • #10
Moonbear said:
I also have fun watching when they are showing someone actually doing a technique...they'll be wearing floppy gloves two sizes too big, rub their face with the gloved hand, grab a pipet tip with that gloved hand to stick it on the pipet, stick the pipet straight into the upright tube containing the only sample...yep, that one's contaminated.
:smile: I'll have to pay closer attention to that.
 
  • #11
the worst thing I've ever seen was an episode of House. The doctor tests a homeless person vomit by tasting it. Turned out the person had rabies and died, another doctor had to get vaccinated, but the vomit taster didn't
 
  • #12
Yes, you've pointed out all the things I've noticed when watching the scripted forensic shows. bwahahaha, its so funny if you know what really goes on.
:biggrin:
 
  • #13
lol. I read an article by a forensic scientist talking about these shows. He was saying he finds it funny how its always dark and they carry torches. He said that when he goes to a crime scene, he just switches the light on.
 
  • #14
I saw that too, Kazza. CSI always reminds me of the X-Files that way. Mulder and Scully's flashlight battery budget was bigger than their car allowance.
 
  • #15
Yeah, I like the shows to just be real and straightforward, guess that's why I am mostly watching the non-fiction crime shows. No hollywood endings either, lol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
11K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
10K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K