Calculating Power to Drag 100kg Log Down 20° Hillside at 0.50 m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter NoMeGusta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Log Power
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power required to drag a 100-kg log down a hillside inclined at 20 degrees, while moving at a speed of 0.50 m/s. The problem involves concepts of potential energy, friction, and work done against gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the relationship between work done, potential energy, and friction in the context of the problem. They question the source of the potential energy change equation provided in the textbook and seek clarification on the meaning of the zero in the equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the definitions of potential energy and the relationship between the variables involved. There is an exploration of the conceptual distinctions regarding work and energy, particularly in the context of friction. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the calculations or the interpretation of the equations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific values such as mass, speed, angle of incline, and coefficient of friction, which are critical to the problem but may not be fully explored due to the complexity of the concepts involved.

NoMeGusta
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What power must a man expend on a 100-kg log that he is dragging down a hillside at a speed of 0.50 m/s ? The hillside makes an angle of 20 degrees with the horizontal and the coefficient of friction is 0.9

m = 100kg
v = 0.50 m/s
[tex]\theta[/tex] = 20 degrees
[tex]\mu[/tex] = 0.9

From here I thought that [tex]W_{man} + W_{f} = \Delta U[/tex]

So, [tex]W_{f} = - \mu mgL \cos{\theta}[/tex] (that I understood), from here the books states that [tex]\Delta U = 0 - mgL \sin{\theta}[/tex] Where did the book get this? What does the 0 represent? How do I find the Power?

The book then says that [tex]P_{man} = \mu mgv \cos{\theta} - mgv \sin{\theta} = 247J[/tex]

Can someone walk me thru this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U is the proper variable symbol for potential energy, gravitational potential energy in this case.

The [tex]mgL \sin{\theta}[/tex] is another way of say "mgh," but on this slope (think triangle), h is the opposide side where L is the hypotenuse. mgh is the change in potential energy. The work done by the guy has to do two things: change the potential energy of the log, and overcome friction.

Conceptual rant:
Depending of conventions and definitions, sometimes the work done to overcome friction is not called "work" but "the mechanical equivalent of heat." That last bit is a mouthful, and I haven't seen it too often in textbooks lately, so I guess it's OK to call it work; the only problem is that it is not a transfer of mechanical energy if it turns to thermal energy, it should be called heat. Alas this distinction is low on the scale of hair-splitting importance.[/concpetual rant]
 
What instrument do you play hemidemisimiquavers? I thought 16th notes were fast enough... geez, I can only imagine 64ths
 
NoMeGusta said:
What instrument do you play hemidemisimiquavers? I thought 16th notes were fast enough... geez, I can only imagine 64ths
I can handle short trills on the piano that are "hemis.":approve: As long as its with fingers 2 & 3 (the thumb is #1 on the piano)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K