What is the Area Under the Curve for 1.5 Standard Deviations from Z=1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluebear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the area under the standard normal curve within 1.5 standard deviations of z=1. The correct answer is identified as 0.6853, but the original poster was unsure how to arrive at this conclusion. It is noted that calculating this area manually is impractical, and reference to statistical tables or online resources is suggested for assistance. The Gaussian function is mentioned as the mathematical basis for the standard normal curve. Ultimately, the poster successfully finds the answer with help from the community.
bluebear
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm having trouble with this one question on my review sheet (yikes, and I have a chapter test on Statistics tomorrow!). The question is: What is the area under the standard normal curve that is within 1.5 standard deviations of z=1?

a) 0.2838 b) 0.3050 c) 0.5637 d) 0.6853 e) 0.7714

The answer is D, but I don't know how to get that answer. Anyway, if anyone can help, that'll be GREAT! Thanks so much!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can't really calculate this with paper and pen. However, there are tables that give you the area between different intervals. I'm not sure what the tables are referred to as, but you could try Googling. Also see Gaussian Integral and error function.

Note : the shape of the std. normal curve is the gaussian function :

f(x)= {\frac {1} {\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-x^2/{2{\sigma}^2}}
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

Thanks for helping! I've finally figured out the answer! =) :smile: :surprise: :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top