Scale Invariance in Global Terrorism

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of scale invariance in global terrorism, particularly in relation to statistical analyses of terrorist attacks and the implications of advancing technology on the nature and frequency of such events. It includes theoretical considerations, potential solutions to mitigate terrorism, and the impact of technological advancements on both terrorism and counter-terrorism efforts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Clauset and Young's findings that extreme terrorist events, like 9/11, fit within a scale-free power distribution, suggesting a potential for similar future events.
  • There is a viewpoint that advancing technology facilitates the manufacturing of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and increases the potential for terrorism due to a larger population and more conflicts.
  • One proposed solution is to promote greater prosperity and democracy, as democracies are less likely to engage in conflict with one another, with historical references to the Great Depression's impact on political extremism.
  • Another suggestion involves using biotechnology for rapid detection and response to biological threats.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of strict regulation of scientific knowledge and technology, citing the potential for significant threats from conventional sources, such as natural gas transportation.
  • There is a concern that if strict state control over science and technology is implemented, it may lead to censorship and monopolization, which could stifle innovation and solutions to terrorism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of technological advancements for terrorism and the effectiveness of proposed solutions. There is no clear consensus on the best approach to address the challenges posed by terrorism or the role of technology in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the relationship between technology, societal factors, and terrorism, which remain unresolved. The potential effectiveness of proposed solutions is also uncertain and contingent on numerous factors.

selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
6,839
Reaction score
11
Clauset and Young, in their new paper http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0502/0502014.pdf , apply standard modern statistics to a database of terrorist strikes ordered by the number of people killed or injured. They find that extreme cases, such as 9/11, are not outliers, but find their place within a scale free power distribution with exponent near 2 (may actually be nearer 1.8). From this they conclude another strike with as many casualties or more than 9/11 can be expected within the next 7 years.

They remark that the ability to kill people has been steadily increasing, which may underly this scale free behavior. I note that scale free or "critical" behavior in many systems is associated with the approach to a change of state.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, advancing technology makes WMDs easies to manufacture. More people mean more potential terrorists and conflicts. Global news and democracy means that the potential reward has increased.

I see some possible solutions:
1. Greater prosperity and more democracy. Democracies never or almost never attack each other. Poverty is one the factors that make people into fanatics. Look for example at the great depression that may have been critical in causing fascist dictatorships in Germany and Japan.

2. Fight technology with technology. Biotechnology might allow very rapid detection of biological weapons and production of antidotes.

3. A worldwide intrusive state. If the above fail and there are great catastrophes due to terrorism or wars, then many might see strict control of science worldwide as inevitable. Research, laboratories, education and knowledge in biotechnology and nuclear physics might become a strictly regulated worldwide state monopoly.
 
Aquamarine said:
Research, laboratories, education and knowledge in biotechnology and nuclear physics might become a strictly regulated worldwide state monopoly.
That might not help much. One of the greatest terrorist threats facing advanced nations today comes in the form of natural gas. A single liquified natural gas tanker would make a pretty big explosion.
http://www.google.com/search?q=terrorist+%22natural+gas%22+tanker
 
hitssquad said:
That might not help much. One of the greatest terrorist threats facing advanced nations today comes in the form of natural gas. A single liquified natural gas tanker would make a pretty big explosion.
http://www.google.com/search?q=terrorist+%22natural+gas%22+tanker
Well, then science has to find a better way to transport the natural gas. Or avoid using it.

But I agree that new technology will constantly make it easier to produce WMDs. So if 3 is chosen, this means that an ever increasing part of science and technology will be censored and monopolized by the state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K