Can Water Be Transformed into a Viable Fuel Source?

[Fromfiretolife]

I am curious about whether water could be used as fuel. Water is H2O right. So if water is two molecules of hydrogen and one molecule of oxygen can thus hydrogen be used as a propulsion fuel and oxygen a burning agent?

 

[Janus]

No. Water is, in essence, hydrogen ash; it is what you get when you burn hydrogen.

To re-burn the hydrogen, you would have to separate it from the oxygen, and this would take more energy than you would get from burning the hydrogen. So you would end up losing energy in the process.

 

[zoobyshoe]

This isn't the same thing as using water for fuel, but I read a guy claim that the hottest possible fire could be obtained by letting oil and water drip onto a preheated metal plate.

His setup was to start a normal wood fire, place the metal plate over it, and let the oil and water drip onto the plate from containers to the side of the fire in a ratio of three drops of water to one drop of oil. The oil was used motor oil.

I think the reason this fire was so hot was because the water dissociated (both because of the heat on the metal plate and the heat of the oil burning) the O2 released probably went right to the combustion of the oil, and the H2 probably joined up with atmospheric O2.

 

[outandbeyond2004]

Water can't be used as fuel, but keep it away from cesium!

 

[Sariaht]

In egypt it can be used as a fuel, if you mix it with a highly thermo-conducting substance, like a black one, and a heat changer. pretty simple really.

The heat changer is an aluminium cone (or parabole) filled with carbon concentrating the light into a beem (partly making it more frequent) and sending it away, thereby cooling the water.

the aluminium parabole can be turned around to heat the water carbon mixture.

Ofcourse there are other ways of solving this problem. Just change the shape of the parabole.

 

[outandbeyond2004]

Sariaht, more details, please.

 

[Sariaht]

I finished my post. The method is superior due of it's closed cylinder system. It don't have to be open since you can regulate it's heat. One could even drink the water when the vehicle is finished.

 

[outandbeyond2004]

Sariaht, what do you think "fuel" means? Is this device supposed to face the sun at all times?

*update* I looked up the word "fuel" in a dictionary. It means anything that can be used to produce energy. So, Sariaht is right. The device that he describes, what I think is called a solar collector, does use water to produce energy.

I was thinking in terms of chemistry. A chemical fuel, is a chemical, which when combined with oxygen or some other oxidizer, produces energy.

If you combine water with sodium, cesium, lithium, potassium, or rubidium, you do produce energy. However, these latter elements are not oxidizers. Take your pick. Water is or is not fuel.

 

[russ_watters]

Originally posted by outandbeyond2004
*update* I looked up the word "fuel" in a dictionary. It means anything that can be used to produce energy. So, Sariaht is right. The device that he describes, what I think is called a solar collector, does use water to produce energy.

No, as the name implies, a "collector" doesn't produce energy, it collects energy.

 

[zoobyshoe]

Originally posted by outandbeyond2004
It means anything that can be used to produce energy. So, Sariaht is right. The device that he describes, what I think is called a solar collector, does use water to produce energy.

No, the water acts as energy transfer or storage. All the energy in this device come from the sun, and none from the water.

 

[outandbeyond2004]

Semantics strikes again.

Energy is energy, agreed. However, it exists in various forms. Often we want energy in one form PRODUCED from energy in another form. E.g. solar energy ==> heat (hot water e.g). Chemical energy ==> motive energy (moving car). Atomic energy ==> electricity.

Ultimately energy production is simply conversion of one form of energy to another. Granted, we often collect energy and often store it, but even so we may need to convert from one form to another. Chemical energy in gasoline ==> roto-motive energy ==> electricity ==> chemical energy in battery.

 

[zoobyshoe]

The reason water isn't a fuel in this case is because, when everything is over, the water is whole, complete, and the same. It has lost nothing. The fuel, here, are the sun's elements, which have lost mass, and are changed.

 

[outandbeyond2004]

I now think the dictionary definition is a poor one. One reason is that what we really want from all the energy conversion is power, ultimately, energy doing something. Another reason is that it is too broad; it fails to exclude the solar collector and the battery, as it should. What, then, shall we use as the definition of fuel? Let us not be fuelish [sorry].

 

[zoobyshoe]

My dictionary defines fuel as: a material that can be used to produce heat or power by burning;;a material from which atomic energy can be liberated esp. in a reactor

I think it is safe to say that what is going on in the sun could be comprised by the second definition.

You just need a more comprehensive dictionary. This is a really good online dictionary that will instantly get you the definitions from several different dictionaries so you can compare and contrast:

OneLook Dictionary Search
Address:http://www.onelook.com/

-zoob

 

[Dorje]

What of the potential for water (well, the deuterium and tritium in the water) to be used as a fuel source for fusion? What % is D and what % is T and how easy is it to get D and T out of H2O?

 

[outandbeyond2004]

Dorje, turning water into fuel is not the same as using it as fuel. Your questions are off topic. I will now leave your questions to someone else, if anyone can and want to answer them.