The Latest in Fusion Reactor Research: Breakthroughs & Challenges

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the current state of fusion reactor research, including major breakthroughs, challenges, and the status of various projects like ITER and NIF. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of fusion energy, including different confinement methods and the feasibility of achieving net energy from fusion reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the progress of fusion research and whether significant breakthroughs are imminent.
  • There is mention of Cold Fusion being dismissed as a viable option by some, with claims that it was based on misunderstandings by its proponents.
  • Participants discuss the two main approaches to controlled thermonuclear fusion: magnetic confinement (e.g., tokamaks) and inertial confinement (e.g., laser fusion).
  • Concerns are raised about the challenges of maintaining the necessary temperatures for fusion reactions, with varying durations achievable by different methods.
  • Some participants note that the ITER project has faced delays and political issues, affecting its timeline and development.
  • There are references to non-mainstream reactor designs, such as fusors and sonoluminescent reactors, which are not expected to produce net energy.
  • Discussions include the potential dangers of fusion technology and the implications of being able to transmute elements, with some participants questioning the feasibility of fusing heavier elements like iron.
  • Participants debate the practicality of producing energy from isotopes of hydrogen compared to other elements, with a focus on the challenges of achieving net energy from fusion.
  • Some participants express personal interests in pursuing studies related to fusion technology, weighing options between magnetic confinement and inertial systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the current state of fusion research, with multiple competing views on the feasibility of various approaches and the implications of fusion technology. Participants express differing opinions on the viability of Cold Fusion and the challenges faced by projects like ITER and NIF.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on political factors affecting international collaborations like ITER, the unresolved status of various experimental reactors, and the ongoing debates about the safety and feasibility of different fusion methods.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and researchers in the fields of physics, engineering, and energy policy, as well as those exploring the future of fusion energy technology.

shingetsunohimitsu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How far is research really gone? Is there any major breakthrough on its way? Are the first prototypes ready yet?

I'm making a project work on this for school, and I find it hard to find sufficient information in books and likes about this, since clearly, books from the beginning of the last decade are going to be very out-of-date today...


I gathered from the Cold Fusion thread, that Cold Fusion is not even an option as it's not do-able?

What are the major obstacles with a fusion reactor as of today? And are there any realistic plans to overcome these obstacles? How far is the research gone in the USA (this is also hard for me to find out since I'm situated in Sweden and mostly can gather info about the JET project)...

ITER is a cooperative effort between Japan, USA and Europe, am I right?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
shingetsunohimitsu said:
How far is research really gone? Is there any major breakthrough on its way? Are the first prototypes ready yet?

I'm making a project work on this for school, and I find it hard to find sufficient information in books and likes about this, since clearly, books from the beginning of the last decade are going to be very out-of-date today...


I gathered from the Cold Fusion thread, that Cold Fusion is not even an option as it's not do-able?

What are the major obstacles with a fusion reactor as of today? And are there any realistic plans to overcome these obstacles? How far is the research gone in the USA (this is also hard for me to find out since I'm situated in Sweden and mostly can gather info about the JET project)...

ITER is a cooperative effort between Japan, USA and Europe, am I right?

shingetsunohimitsu,

First Cold Fusion was a fraud - a couple chemists went public with some
work they didn't understand - and the physics community agrees that
cold fusion never did exist.

Controlled thermonuclear fusion is incredibily difficult - research has
been underway for decades. There are two main approaches - magnetic
confinement and inertial confinement.

Magnetic confinement is the attempt to contain the reaction a magnetic
"bottle". Tokamaks are the leading type of magnetic fusion machine.
That said, the USA has not built a tokamak in years. The leading machine
was the TFTR - Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at Princeton University's
Plasma Physics Center.

The ITER would follow the work of TFTR - but it has been under discussion
for over a decade - and nothing has actually been built.

In the are of inertial confinemet fusion - i.e. "laser fusion" research is
continuing at the Omega Laser at the University of Rochester. The NIF -
the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore is in the process
of bringing up the lasers. The physical facility has been built - and will
eventually have 192 laser chains. About 8 laser chains are now operating:

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/index.html

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/lib_construction.html

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/lib_highlights.html

The NIF will be the first machine to achieve "ignition" - that is to
generate as much energy from fusion as was put into the fusion fuel.

However, that's a long, long way from generating large amounts of
power.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist LLNL
 
shingetsunohimitsu said:
How far is research really gone? Is there any major breakthrough on its way? Are the first prototypes ready yet?

ITER is a cooperative effort between Japan, USA and Europe, am I right?

If you view ITERs website http://www.iter.org, somewhere on there is a timeline. I believe that they are expecting their experimental reactor to come online somewhere around 2010 so that commerically viable plants can be built later on.

The United States dropped out of ITER for a while (political reasons) and rejoined last year along with China and Korea.
 
Last edited:
There are non-mainstream reactor designs. For example fusors (http://www.fusor.net/) which are not likely to ever produce net energy and sonoluminescent reactors (sorry, no link).
 
shingetsunohimitsu said:
What are the major obstacles with a fusion reactor as of today?

I recently had the opportunity to visit Omega. The first major obstacle is to maintain the large temperature that is needed to make a reaction. With inertial confinement, it lasts for nanoseconds (a short laser pulse). A bit more (milliseconds?) is achieved with tokamaks. NIF will do an important step by reaching a break-even point.

It is important to note that these systems are also used by astrophysicists to simulate star core physics, they are not just pre-pre-... - reactor prototypes.
 
I suppose the ITER project is lagging a bit due to the member countries bickering about the location of the next stage experimental reactor, which I think ought to be a major improvement over the previous ones and pave the way for "commercial" ones (with any luck).
 
Fusion is too dangerous and has been killed. If you have a good fusion system you are able to transmute to produce any end product you wish. As you can guess that can be very dangerous.

The best fusion results to date have been the predecessor of the proposed X-1 project

http://www.sandia.gov/media/Z.htm

This has dropped of the scope and I don’t think you will find anymore about results.
 
4Newton said:
Fusion is too dangerous and has been killed. If you have a good fusion system you are able to transmute to produce any end product you wish. As you can guess that can be very dangerous.

Who said this and when? And what about fusion of iron and heavier atoms which are endothermic fusion reactions? In theory those elemnts could be fused but how would any man made machine be able to produce that much energy if even stars implode when fusing iron?
 
The only practical fusion reactors are those converting isotopes of hydrogen to helium. Anything else would involve much higher temperatures and pressures and would be impossible today on any useful scale.
 
  • #10
Exactly, mathman. Being able to produce any end product you could want would require being able to do H to He and get net energy from it, to continue fusion. Producing Plutonium or Uranium from just Hydrogen would still be a long ways off even if we could.
 
  • #11
theCandyman said:
Exactly, mathman. Being able to produce any end product you could want would require being able to do H to He and get net energy from it, to continue fusion. Producing Plutonium or Uranium from just Hydrogen would still be a long ways off even if we could.

Candyman,

Exactly - producing Plutonium and Uranium is best left to supernovae.

You get the minimum binding energy per nucleon with Iron.

If you fuse elements lighter than Iron - you get energy.

If you fission elements heavier than Iron - you get energy.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
  • #12
I'm hedging my bets on saltwater. Hot fusion seems to be our only road forward. I'm still undecided as to whether I should study magnetic confinement or inertial/laser systems though. My gut says "magnetics", but laser-type systems have become more viable. Is this correct? This is my first year in college, and I do have to choose a suitable university in Ca.
 
  • #13
Savitri, the University of California has very good engineering programs at the San Diego (UCSD), Santa Barbara (UCSB) and LA (UCLA) campuses. And there is also UC Berkeley, which still has a nuclear engineering program.

In addition, General Atomic is located there in San Diego.
 
  • #14
Thanks Astronuc.
 
  • #15
Ok, this thread is a bit old (has been dormant for about a month until yesterday), but if anyone is still interested, goolge for "fusion ignition research experiment", aka FIRE (unforetunately, googling for "fire" gives too many irrelevant results, so you have to use the full name).
 
  • #16
Heard today that the location of ITER might finally be set ... France ... I've been out of the loop for a while, anyone got any other information on this or is this just a scoop ?
 
  • #17
What happens if you replace the NIF lasers with say electrons with the proper energy to create x-rays in a closed high-Z chamber?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K