Constant velocity or at constant acceleration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether it is more feasible for humans to walk at a constant velocity or at a constant acceleration. Participants explore the practicalities and limitations of maintaining either state over time and distance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that maintaining a constant velocity is difficult due to the need for precise control, suggesting that true constant velocity requires a level of accuracy that humans may not possess.
  • Others propose that while constant acceleration is theoretically interesting, it is practically impossible to sustain for long periods due to physical limitations and fatigue.
  • One participant suggests that over short distances, both velocity and acceleration are constantly changing, but over longer distances, constant velocity becomes more reasonable.
  • Another viewpoint indicates that measuring average velocity over a distance can give the appearance of maintaining constant velocity, even if instantaneous velocity varies.
  • Some participants mention that using rhythmic movements, like counting beats, could help achieve a more consistent walking speed, implying that maintaining constant velocity may be more feasible than constant acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the feasibility of maintaining constant velocity versus constant acceleration, with no consensus reached on which is more achievable in practice.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in human physical capabilities and the challenges of measuring velocity and acceleration accurately over time and distance.

dg_5021
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Are we more likely to be able to walk at constant velocity or at constant acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dg_5021 said:
Are we more likely to be able to walk at constant velocity or at constant acceleration?

Walking with a constant velocity would be very difficult over a period of even a few seconds. You have to take into account that a truely constant velocity would require 100% accuracy. That is, with no rounding of time. There's a difference between walking 1 m/s and walking 1.000324 m/s, and this isn't true constant velocity. I don't think humans have the accuracy needed to walk at a constant velocity.

z-component
 
Like wise constant acceleration would be impossible to maintain for any but very short periods of time. If you consider your velocity over significantly large distances you will probably find that constant velocity is a more reasonable answer.

On a small scale, like a singe stride of course your velocity is constantly changing, but so is your acceleration, so you cannot call it constant anything on that scale. If you look at anything over 2 or 3 strides a constant velocity is much more likely then a constant acceleration. Even when you are running you only accelerate for the first few strides.

I am sure someone will claim me incorrect because of some Olympic sprinter, just broaden your definition of "a few"!
 
well it would be impossible to accelarate constantly since we would have limits on how fast we can go, so it would sort of look like a square root graph, and we could only maintain a high speed for so long before we would get tired. however if you look at it this way, you measure the distance traveled, say 1 Km, and it took you one hour to get there, you would then be traveling at one km per hour, then you would pick random points, many of them, and measure your velocity at that point, and if it's 1km/hour most of the time then you are maintainting a constant velocity.

on a diffrent note, say you are counting half notes, and every half note you put one foot infront of the other, this would come very close to getting you a constant velocity, either way its' more pheasable to keep going the same speed than to keep accelerating at the same rate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K