Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Hey guys,
I've often seen in the definition of a Fiber bundle a projection map [itex]\pi: E\rightarrow B[/itex] where E is the fiber bundle and B is the base manifold. This projection is used to project each individual fiber to its base point on the base manifold. I then see a lot of references to the inverse of this projection map. It seems to me, that in general, this map should be many to one, since it should project a whole fiber to its base point. In this case, how can one define an inverse to this map? It seems odd to me that there can be an inverse to a many to one mapping...or have I missed something basic? 
Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
It is manytoone in general (and that's really one of the points of this whole construction!) so it makes no sense to talk about its inverse map. Are you perhaps confusing the notation for the preimage [itex]\pi^{1}(U) = \{ e \in E \colon \pi(e) \in U \}[/itex] of a subset U of B under [itex]\pi[/itex] with the identical notation for the image of U under the inverse of [itex]\pi[/itex] (a function that doesn't necessarily exist)?
P.S. A standard abuse of notation is to use [itex]\pi^{1}(b)[/itex] to denote the preimage of the singleton {b}, i.e. the fiber lying over b. 
Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
That's probably it, but I haven't seen it termed "preimage" in any of my books, maybe they are just getting a little sloppy here.
The first mention of this, my book simply says: "...which means that the bundle over any set [itex]U_j[/itex], which is just [itex]\pi^{1}(U_j)[/itex], has a homeomorphism..." I guess since the book didn't call it an inverse nor a preimage, I simply assumed it meant inverse and got confused. For example, the wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber_bundle also simply just uses this notation without clarification. 
Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Yes, that's the inverse image, and it's pretty standard notation in topology. The reason you haven't seen it explicitly defined in your books is (probably) due to the fact that books dealing with bundles tend to assume basic topology (and all the accompanying notation and terminology) as a prereq.

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
So it's just overloaded notation huh...that seems inconvenient...

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
A follow up question. My book discusses the structure group of fiber bundles and seems to imply that a trivial structure group (one where the structure group can be reduced to simply {1}) means a trivial fiber bundle (one where the fiber bundle is isomorphic to a product space).
The book isn't very explicit about this, however. I was just wondering if this condition is "necessary and sufficient"? I.e. Is a fiber bundle trivial if and only if its structure group is trivial? Or perhaps this condition is only necessary but not sufficient, or sufficient but not necessary? Also, my book makes mention of a "frame bundle". I can't see the difference between a frame bundle and a tangent bundle other than that the frame bundle doesn't include the base element in its fibers. What's the difference? The wikipedia article is not really accessible to me. 
Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Yes, a bundle is trivial iff its structure group can be reduced to {1}.
And re: frame bundle. The fiber at a point x in the tangent bundle is the tangent space T_{x}M at x; the fiber at a point x in the frame bundle is the set of all ordered bases (i.e. frames) for T_{x}M. So we're really dealing with completely different objects: the tangent bundle is a vector bundle, i.e. its fibers are vector spaces, whereas the frame bundle isn't. 
Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Can you explain "the set of all ordered bases (i.e. frames) for TxM"? When I hear that I'm thinking of basis vectors, of which it's pretty arbitrary.

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
every surjection has a right inverse, and these are called sections.

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
How is that defined? Without much context, I'm not sure which part of my post you are referring to, or what point you wanted to make...

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Quote:
Now, what's the frame bundle of M? It's a fiber bundle over M where the fiber glued to x consists of ordered bases for the tangent space at x. Literally a point in the frame bundle above x is an ordered basis [v_1,...,v_n] for T_{x}M. 
Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Hmmm...so, that seems pretty arbitrary in my choice of bases. If I can choose "all ordered bases", don't I get back T[sub]x[\sub]M? I'm thinking "all ordered bases" would include pretty much every single vector other than the 0 vector because certainly every vector is in some arbitrary choice of bases...

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
After rereading your last post, i think I get it. Thanks =D

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Quote:

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Quote:

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Quote:

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
Quote:

Re: Fiber Bundle Projection Map
I need to go back and read this part again lol...

All times are GMT 5. The time now is 10:49 PM. 
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000  2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014 Physics Forums